We'll be talking about

User:Filll/AGF Challenge

How do you go about solving situations like this?

Start by formulating an initial position:


Try to answer the following questions:

  1. The action you would like to take , and a personal reason why you are in support of that action.
    • what's your gut feeling
    • who is involved
    • what needs to be attained
    • what's the best outcome for the encyclopedia?
    • how can that outcome be attained?
  2. What would theoretically needs to be said or done to make you reverse that position, or where you would be willing to compromise
    • where might there be flaws in your reasoning
    • what could you give up on and still (mostly) achieve your goal?
  3. A reason why you think others (will) support that position (ie, why is this likely to gain consensus).
    • What policies, guidelines or essays have there been written? What direction do they tend to point to?
    • Who is involved? What are their opinions? (read talk pages, and see if you can find previous statements)
    • How will they respond to your tentative action?
    • Can you modify your action to make that response more favorable?
  4. What likely would need to be said or done to reverse the position of the community. , or where the community might be willing to compromise
    • What flaws are there in other people's reasoning?
    • what could they give up on and still (mostly) achive their goal?


If you are an admin, or BOLD editor, or what have you...

Now you can continue using WP:BRD

if you are a mediator