Original name(s) | Uncertain: EBlack, D.Right, and probably Agiantman and 24.147.97.230 |
---|---|
Wikilifespan | 1st half 2005 - 2012 |
ISP | Various |
Known IPs | Any (uses IPs around the world) |
Known hostmasks | See intel |
Physical location | Past Hong Kong, possibly UK, or Netherlands |
Requests for comment | Probably same as Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Agiantman and Wikipedia:Requests for comment/24.147.97.230. |
Sockpuppet investigations | HeadleyDown |
Requests for arbitration | Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Neuro-linguistic programming (list of blocks in that article) and probably same as: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Regarding Ted Kennedy |
Instructions | Block on sight Block on behavior (variable country IP) |
Status | Archived |
Please report all ongoing incidents of abuse to AIV or ANI |
HeadleyDown (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is the best known alias of a community-banned Wikipedia vandal and habitual reincarnator who specializes in massive sneaky pov vandalism with multiple sock/meatpuppets (around 50 - 80 over some 3 years, often 3 - 10 at a time on multiple articles), devastating articles by long term damage, and driving away bona fide editors. It is not always clear which editors are socks, and which are meats run by his associates.
His preferred technique is to engage severe POV slanting/hostile editing, often via gradually introduced socks.
HeadleyDown initially acts as the "sweet voice of a reasonable editor", claiming to have a scientific or neutral interest, seeking minor improvements, POV fixes, balance, or a legitimate "scientific/neutral" viewpoint in an otherwise not-bad article. However in practice long-term he is[citation needed] a virulent and destructive subtle POV warrior who ignores bona fide research (sometimes calling it "promotion") and gradually over time using multiple socks forces a massive POV slant until articles end up attacking their own subjects, or twisted to a very one-sided POV, rather than explaining them. This is claimed to be "more concise", "more scientific", "cited", "skeptical", "keeping pov out", or "more neutral", a stance undermined by at least one incarnation where he pov warred on the opposing side instead. At times, he has forged cites and credentials, invented material, and deleted bona fide information, to do this. He is quite tenacious and persistent and tries to come back if blocked. He favors "the best defense is a strong offense" and accuses others of multiple bad actions when criticized, to muddy the waters.
It is worth noting that Wikipedians lacking prior experience usually mistake HeadleyDown's socks as being good-faith editors, perhaps who don't quite understand 'personal attack', and treat his disputes as run-of-the-mill content/civility/3RR/NPOV issues. As a result his socks are very often given much good faith even by experienced editors, and only slightly chastised by Arbcom, which he uses to continue degrading the article and deterring genuine editorship for months on end.
The most obvious visible symptom is a combination of
HeadleyDown has been classed as "block on behavior" by David Gerard, repeatedly confirmed by Mackensen. Because of his modus operandi the significant damage he does is not easy to unravel.
Operates under multiple IP's, often multiple socks at a time. Often claims initially to have helpful information and merely want to help with a few problems with the article. Plays the game with policies, especially WP:NPOV, cites, and demands for cites. Eventually turns to virulent personal attacks (alleging bias, promotion, covert support for topic X) to kill off any editors who might object to their actions. Appears to be within rules and yet somehow the article keeps getting more and more extreme, even as claiming to be "helping" it or making it "more neutral".
Often cites tangential or minor writers as if major or expert, whilst rubbishing deleting or ignoring genuine facts, attacks (often by playing WP:CITE) others who revert or correct the POV slants, and either gradually or viciously builds a case accusing those who try to include genuine facts or balance of being biased, and of working "against" the neutral editors or against policy.
Has forged cites or chosen selective interpretations, to support his edits. Long term aim is to turn articles into cynical travesties of themselves over time on the basis that this is "the real view", "neutral", "more scientific", "wikipedias view", or the like.
Has also attacked article contributors (eg mentor:Woohookitty: [1][2][3] and User:FT2 [4]), at times threatening editors with bans or other disciplinary procedures if they do not "work with neutral editors", discussing their "crimes", "vandalism" or "blatent bias", agreeing (between socks) they should be ignored etc. If accused of wrongdoing, will deny, and counteraccuse bias or bad faith. Sometimes he uses socks to support or argue with his other socks to "muddy the waters" or prevent rational discussion, or during RFC/RFArb.
Also likely to be long term: promised to leave neuro-linguistic programming but instead within a day or so came back as 3 or 4 new socks. When finally removed from there came back 6 days later under a new name on zoophilia. Simultaneous to NLP (which reached RFArb) was also subject of independent 2nd RFArb under other aliases on Ted Kennedy et al, and active on Stalin. After attacking NLP for months, started inserting equally spurious pro-NLP edits and views in multiple articles and talk pages in July 2006 (reverted by many editors). May be active elsewhere too. Seems to focus on only one (or a few) article at a time, but stick with them long term.
HeadleyDown often tries to recruit meatpuppets as well as using socks: see this comment on RFC/24.147.97.230 for the Kennedy articles, and the RFArb for RFArb/Neuro-linguistic_programming#Likely_source_of_visiting_users_identified on NLP, for two examples. More recently tried to recruit user:Jean Mercer for "help" with NLP (Q2 2007) [she declined] and contacted by email fellow banned sock-warrior user:DPeterson on the Attachment Therapy arbitration case (Q3 2007), as well.
Headley also contacts editors by email, and when rebanned or discovered, or has meats removed, attempts to "spin" this as success, or as helping by removing disruptive editors or exposing bad practice. Spurious in each case.
There are a variety of strong evidences which rapidly help to identify a HeadleyDown reincarnation or sock. Please contact FT2 for details if suspected.
David Gerard advises IP variability is such that IP alone is not sufficient to detect. [9]
Mackensen confirmed on RFCU that suspected HeadleyDown socks should be blocked on behavioral evidence even if Checkuser is unhelpful. [10]
Pages known to be attacked:
HeadleyDown's preference is to cause long term POV/NPA damage with extended chaos and dominate articles via his socks, so once he's firmly and dismissively called on it and editors stop being drawn into his sock-dramas (WP:DFTT), the article is no longer likely to be such good "entertainment fodder". So spotting him (ie "this could be HeadleyDown's work" as opposed to "just another typical POV/3RR/NPA editor") and blocking on sight solves much of it. Of necessity such blocks have to be "on suspicion and behavior", and if caught he will deny, deny, deny - and counteraccuse (play the game that not giving good faith to his edits shows extreme bias). If removed, watchlist the article for new socks in future and add suspected socks/meats to this page.
Examples of dismissals that worked: (1) dismissively letting him know he's spotted, (2) response to new meatpuppet why they can't edit despite claiming to be a different person.
Evidence that the community tends to view HeadleyDown as community-banned in the sense of WP:BAN includes:
HeadleyDown himself (via EBlack and D.Right) only goes back as far as early 2005. However it is likely from Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming and other RFC/RFArb posts that HeadleyDown was also Agiantman and 24.147.97.230, and examination of articles and disputes that user was in reveals that HeadleyDown had a parallel incarnation (including a large number of socks and anon IPs) simultaneous to his involvement on NLP, which were independently the subject of a second set of RFC's and ArbCom in 2005.
Main aliases | Alias used | Articles attacked |
---|---|---|
As twin sockpuppets EBlack and D.Right and also A.Warner |
March - August 2005 | Scientology, Electroencephalography and Neuro-linguistic programming |
As Agiantman and many others, probably including 24.147.97.230 | July - August 2005 | Bill Clinton, Kathleen Willey, Dan Rather, Ted Kennedy, Stalin and other similar articles, and then Neuro-linguistic programming |
As HeadleyDown and many others | August 2005 - June 2006 (blocked) | Neuro-linguistic programming (anti-NLP) |
As JHartley and FFodor | July 2006 (one blocked, one not) | Zoophilia |
As Mindstore | July 2006 (not blocked) | Neurolinguistics, Psychotherapy, Linguistics, Cognitive linguistics (pro-NLP) |
As CSIvor | July 2006 (not blocked) | Zoophilia and Paraphilia, also various others (Canada, Criminal law, Crime scene photography) |
As RoKeMo | July 2006 (not blocked) | Psychology and ScienTOMogy |
As 144.214.62.99 | July 2006 (not blocked) | Personal attack sock |
Private email from HeadleyDown, 13 June 2006:
Comment by mentor Woohookitty after HeadleyDown blocked, when new socks started to show up (20 June 2006) [11]:
Response to a post on WP:ANI that his activities were self sacrificing to help Wikipedia be more neutral in the light of POV editing by others (11 Feb 2007) post response:
Email after another sock block (Nov 2007) "Well, that took you long enough to work out".
The first two of these editors were the subject of two RFC's and one RFArb for edits in connection with Ted Kennedy and other political articles, and had near-identical modus and timing to HeadleyDown. Again, there was other evidence tying them in, see user:FT2 for details. The 3rd is behaviorally confirmed. The last two are covered in the RFC on 24.147.97.230 and RFArb on Ted Kennedy.
Meatpuppets or possible sockpuppets:
Untested possible sockpuppets:
Untested sockpuppets:
Other IPs used include:
(Not all socks are included on this page)