- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Delete. — xaosflux Talk 01:20, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Book:1991[edit]
- Book:1991 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
With only three articles, one of which is relatively short, and given the fact that all three of these articles are present in Book:Azealia Banks, I see no reason for this book to be needed. Azealia911 talk 07:22, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The book titled "1991" should obviously be about the year 1991 and not an album called 1991. Deletion will clear the way for a book about the year to be made (...maybe). A2soup (talk)
- Actually, given my reasoning above, a better solution would be better to move to Book:1991 (album) without leaving a redirect. The book was recently created (20 Feb) and deleting it might be disruptive/bitey for the author. It is a possibly legitimate book (are there book notability guidelines?), just at the wrong title. A2soup (talk) 06:37, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. With so few articles, it just seems the better option is Book:Azealia Banks, which the book's author created after this one. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:50, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.