The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep . Only fair to give it more time since it was REFUNDED. No prejudice against renomination later for tendentious resubmissions. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 10:27, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Draft:Ankita Parakh[edit]

Abandoned page declined by three different reviewers at AfC for lack of notability. Up for G13 but tag removed. Legacypac (talk) 21:31, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Comment: What was your rationale for removing the G13, Graeme Bartlett? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:02, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

already deleted and undeleted This was already deleted via g13. Please look at the deletion log before nominating for deletion for the reason that was already actioned, but no longer applies. There was a request at WP:REFUND to restore it by Suhana Jaiswal, so I restored and removed the g13 tag, so that it was not immediately invalidly deleted after the restore. REFUND requests for g13 are normally honoured if it is the first request, and another speedy delete reason does not apply. So I see no reason to delete this at this point in time. Give the writer a chance to improve the page. If they don't it will be gone in another 6 months. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:35, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.