The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 18:23, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Cowrywise[edit]

Cowrywise This draft was Rejected by User:Celestina007 on 17 February 2021. It would have become eligible for G13 in about two weeks, except that the originator removed the Reject notice: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Cowrywise&type=revision&diff=1036611868&oldid=1036610597&diffmode=source and resubmitted it. This action is disruptive and is an effort to game the system to bypass a rejection and possibly to confuse the reviewers. Rather than restarting the G13 clock, please respect the intention of the Rejection by deleting the draft. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:48, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Per Robert McClenon trying to game the system is never a good idea. Non notable article. Celestina007 (talk) 03:59, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per resubmission following rejection/removal of rejection notice. — csc^-1 04:09, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Quite apart from the attempt to manipulate our rules, this article will never show enough notability to pass afd. DGG ( talk ) 20:34, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.