The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep . Also: withdrawn. Will move to Famous Dex ~ Amory (u • t • c) 15:59, 13 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Draft:Famous Dex[edit]

Draft:Famous Dex (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

It once again begins to lack WP:ANYBIO and WP:MUSICBIO, due to the fact that it doesn't prove any sources cited on neigher the career section nor discography. Also, poor on WP:REFERENCE. BJPlaya10 (talk) 00:27, 8 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Withdraw Since it seems that it meets the criteria, I choose to withdraw and close this nomination, once again. I did the wrong move. BJPlaya10 (talk) 20:23, 11 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Speedy keep. Making the Billboard Hot 100 chart meets WP:MUSICBIO criterion #2. I am about to move it to main article space, as it clearly meets inclusion criteria. If the sourcing is poor, then improve it. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:41, 8 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Speedy Keep as it appears Famous Dex has become famous enough for Wikipedia, but
• Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Famous Dex (2)
• Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Famous Dex (3rd nomination)
• Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Famous Dex (2nd nomination)
• Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Famous Dex
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Famous Dex from 2016

• Famous Dex is create protected. Going to need an Admin to move this. Legacypac (talk) 02:56, 8 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Comment to closer: This close will have to be conducted by an admin if closure is to move to mainspace as the name is create protected. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 20:39, 8 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  I'm an admin, but I've already !voted here so if a non-admin wants to close this, just ping me and I'll move the article to main space. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:22, 8 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Anachronist: I would (and appreciate the offer), but I !voted below after I realized I couldn't conduct the close on my own. Oh well, no real rush. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 05:22, 12 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Speedy keep Somewhat meets WP:SKCRIT #3 as has reliable sources indicating that it meets WP:MUSICBIO criterion #2 (specifically, Billboard itself). I agree that the draft could use better sourcing, but it is need of improvement, not deletion. The deletion rationale references WP:MUSICBIO, so I am surprised that #2 would have been missed. This draft should never have been nominated. Please do WP:BEFORE before nominating pages for deletion. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 20:41, 8 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Speedy Keep again he meets notability criteria. I cleaned up as much as I could as far as content and referencing, so if anything should be removed, remove it, not the draft. Melodies1917 (talk) 18:53, 9 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.