The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 17:21, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Adam Ant[edit]

Portal:Adam Ant (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Portal mass created without much care or consideration. Did the creator even look at this after hitting publish? Look at the Subcategories section where the Category is a redlink. The Portal posts the lede of the article on Ant, some little snippets from articles on songs, a reproduction of the nav box and a useless link to the Ref Desk. One of the selected images duplicates the lede image.

Fails WP:PORTAL guidelines "portals should be about broad subject areas, which are likely to attract large numbers of interested readers and portal maintainers." There are large numbers of new portals on bands and musicians that have roughly the same issues. Since the previous nominations have been labeled fringe [1] I've posted some more selected more or less randomly.

A test case for the Music portals. Most musicians have a tight cluster of pages around the musician's page that are linked from the page. A portal is not helpful for navigation when the article lays out their albums and songs in detail anyway. The photos are just pulled from the article anyway so they add nothing.

Legacypac (talk) 04:40, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.