The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:51, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Intermodal containers[edit]

Topic that fails existing guideline for portals "portals should be about broad subject areas, which are likely to attract large numbers of interested readers and portal maintainers." Wikipedia:Portal/Guidelines Legacypac (talk) 10:02, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

delete This is a useless page, where the article is a better place to start from. Very few people are looking at this page (often none on a day) so I can see there is no demand for such a page. Are we also going to get nominations of a few hundred more useless portals that have been recently created? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:19, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or put the portal in an intermodal container and send it to Antarctica. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:27, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.