- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: WP:SNOW keep (non-admin closure) Dronebogus (talk) 17:26, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:User no antifa (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Appears to me to violate content restrictions on userboxen. RockstoneSend me a message! 08:23, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Because it appears, at least to me, that the userbox only exists to start quarrels and be obnoxious, much like the traditional marriage userboxes from years ago. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 00:39, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Do you have evidence in the form of diffs that this userbox has started any quarrel other than the one you've initiated with this process? --LaserLegs (talk) 12:47, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - They're only trying to delete this because I posted my opinions on ITN that they didn't like, and they're making false claims of me only editing Wikipedia for political propaganda. The hell? CR-1-AB (talk) 18:16, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Please read WP:ASPERSIONS. I didn't propose this because you posted something on ITN, I proposed this because your post brought to my attention that this userbox exists. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 00:39, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - As mentioned previously, there are many, many, many other politics-related userboxes, some of which are more inflammatory than this one. Partofthemachine (talk) 23:13, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as there are hundreds of opinionated userboxes spanning across the political spectrum here on Wikipedia, and this one isn't hateful and just states the opposition of the movement, so there isn't much of a valid reason to delete it. Waddles 🗩 🖉 23:19, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination; WP:OTHERSTUFF isn't really an argument. Beside that, IMHO opposing antifa could be interpreted as supporting alt-right, and that should be avoided on Wikipedia. —Sundostund (talk) 07:41, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Give me a break. We're not in the business of selective censorship here.--🌈WaltCip-(talk) 17:21, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - For the information of the Australian, antifa means anti-fascism, but is a left-wing domestic terrorist movement. Antifa and alt-right are roughly mirror images (a mirror reverses left and right). Robert McClenon (talk) 02:13, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- keep there is absolutely nothing about opposing antifa that automatically equals alt-right or other extreme right ideologies. Dronebogus (talk) 12:49, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Here in the United States there are independent voters who belong to neither of the major parties. This isn't a black or white issue as opposing Antifa does not make you a Nazi, there are those who oppose Antifa's tactics and advocate for a different approach. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 12:55, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]