The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was move to Dillon J. Stevens and redirect to Dillon Stevens. Titoxd^(?!?) 08:16, 11 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Aaron Booth/Dillon J Stevens[edit]

Bio of a dancer that does not appear to pass WP:ACTOR which covers entertainers of this type. Legacypac (talk) 02:48, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keep. Sourced, no BLP concerns, just an old userpage. Replacing with ((Inactive userpage blanked)) is all that should be done. Creation of this MfD page to delete that old harmless page was a net negative set of edits. Please just blank old things that are harmless. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:50, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A keep result will lead to moving it to mainspace where it is likely to be AfD'd by a more decerning editor. Legacypac (talk) 17:56, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No one is endorsing a move to mainspace. No policy recommends a move to mainspace following a keep result at MfD. If you move it to mainspace after a keep result, that's your decision and should reflect your personal opinion that it is ready for mainspace. Anything other reason for moving is just WP:POINT. A keep !vote here, for most people, means keep it in the userspace and do nothing. A2soup (talk) 20:58, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Objecting to moving something you want keep is pretty pointy. If it needs to be kept obviously you must feel it is notable, otherwise it should be deleted. Also it is in userspace but is a draft article not a userpage. Legacypac (talk) 21:34, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well, you could have people vote in AFD to userify it so it would just bounce back and forth. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 19:10, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keep AFAICT there's no policy-based reason to remove the edit history from Wikipedia. The article is already in the mainspace at Dillon Stevens; the contents of this page were copied and pasted there in 2011. WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:45, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Move to Dillon J. Stevens (add a period) in mainspace and redirect to Dillon Stevens. Contents have been incorporated into mainspace article that was created before this and a history merge would just be more confusing than useful. The middle initial seems like a plausible redirect and it's better than a generic cross-space one. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 19:13, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Support the above. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:51, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I like to think outside the box. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:50, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Excellent idea - makes a lot of sense. Fagles (talk) 13:09, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.