The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete, WP:SNOW applies here, also, unanimous.. — Cirt (talk) 01:54, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dandy Sephy/Sandboxes/Gunsmith Cats[edit]

This user page appears to be a WP:FAKEARTICLE. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 23:28, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not a fake article, but a copy of an old version of a current article. It appears to be a simple copy of Gunsmith Cats, made 20:10, 22 August 2009 from this version. The user wasn't even editing the article. Delete. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:35, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete--per SmokeyJoe. --E♴(talk) 13:55, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No reason at all to keep this. ~~ Hi878 ^{(Come shout at me!)} 22:43, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, WP:FAKEARTICLE. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 10:11, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archival copy, as in - "Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes". This is also a blatant copyvio as it has no reference, backlink, or edit summary that would lead one back to the article SmokeyJoe points to and that is required by our license for attribution; I considered G12ing it to smithereens but it is valuable to me for illustrative purposes to show what an archival copy is to those so fond of pointing to that section of WP:UP when it doesn't apply, so I leave killing it to someone else ;).--Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 22:18, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.