The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:40, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dgheimjoseph/Dgheim number[edit]

Page, by its inventor, about a dimensionless number concerned with the physics of fluid flow. It was posted as an article in 2013, taken to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dgheim number as non-notable, but speedied after the author blanked the page. He is a genuine scientist with a number of publications, but a search for this number in Google Scholar finds only a single reference, so it does not appear that the idea has been taken up, and it fails WP:No original research and is not likely to make an article. JohnCD (talk) 10:08, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I see it as promotion by a WP:COI WP:SPA. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:45, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.