The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. MER-C 05:17, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:JD Caselaw/Constitutional Law (Stone, Seidman, Sunstein, Tushnet, Karlan)[edit]

User:JD Caselaw/Constitutional Law (Stone, Seidman, Sunstein, Tushnet, Karlan) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Long-abandoned user subpage of long-retired editor (last active in 2011), which is a complete copy of the table of contents of a law school textbook. The header on the page expressly states it was created by a law school study group primarily to help with future exams. postdlf (talk) 01:32, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• It sounds partially to do with building up articles, but it is a bit of a copyright infringement, so I will vote delete Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:11, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per WP:NOTTEXTBOOK. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:42, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete; I have copied all remaining redlinks to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law#Another list of cases (and topics). bd2412 T 15:02, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.