The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete all. Wikipedia is not a social network, which these user pages are. --Coredesat 06:36, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Lemonsour[edit]

Wikipedia is not a social networking site. User concerned has made only 6 of 514 edits to the mainspace. Contested prod. Also nominated are User:Beingone, User:LostWhiteWolf, User:Xox TriniBenny xoX, User:I don't like the drugs but the drugs like me and User:Xx your little nightmare xX, who have not edited the mainspace in 158, 13, 18, 21 and 11 edits respectively, User:NeonWolf who has 1 in 160 mainspace edits and the subpages User:Lemonsour/Strong views, User:Lemonsour/Poems, User:Lemonsour/Contact and User:NeonWolf/Quotes. All users are part of a rather large social networking group I encountered which includes Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DarkPoetLostSoul and have no intention of actually contributing.

I think I've got them all, but somehow I feel there's more out there... MER-C 06:53, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I checked some of your work, and I think you've got it right. YechielMan 07:03, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete obvious social group, they have very little interest in editing [1]. Well done for finding them all. Hut 8.5 08:31, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My intuition was correct: there's also User:Sohmalover, User:Mangalover411 and User:Mangalover911, with zero mainspace contributions in 33, 10 and 63 edits respectively. MER-C 09:11, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all Wikipedia is not myspace, great work by MER-C. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 18:19, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Actually, I WAS part of that for a while. After reading WP:NOT, I stopped and am now making more mainspace contributions. Did you notice me? :o Also, I don't think User:Sohmalover and User:Mangalover411 are part of the same group as User:Lemonsour and User:NeonWolf is. Jack^Talk 21:38, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes I did. That's how I stumbled across the other accounts. But seeing that you have made about seven times more mainspace contributions than the rest of them combined, I looked the other way. MER-C 03:19, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you, I guess, but I have one question. How will deleting their userpages and subpages cause them to make more contributions to articles? Jack^Talk 03:23, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wikipedia:User page: "Wikipedia provides user pages to facilitate communication among participants in its project to build an encyclopedia." Since these guys don't belong in this category, they're not entitled to have one. MER-C 04:19, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Ok, thank you for the clarification. Jack^Talk 05:22, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep all improper nomination of multiple user pages in single nomination. Each must be evaluated separately to avoid a WP:BITE violation. Also, did you talk to any of these editors before nominating their pages for deletion? -N 20:15, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• WP:BITE does not apply to "editors" who have no intention of contributing to the encyclopedia. Wikipedia has nothing to lose by telling people who are only here to chat to shove off. MER-C 04:19, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Completely proper nomination of a rash of non-editors using Wikipedia resources for screwing around. Good job, there. --Calton | Talk 07:14, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.