The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was blanked — Werdna talk 11:59, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• User:LordsReform/History (edit | [[Talk:User:LordsReform/History|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - This one also for essentially the same reasons.

Although sourced, this seems to be an original research essay discussing the merits of governmental reform and not an encyclopedic article draft. This hasn't been edited in any significant manner since 2006 and we already have an article on the subject at Lords Reform. RichardΩ612 Ɣ ɸ 15:36, May 26, 2008 (UTC)

• Delete as abandoned original research (wow, every single reference is to a primary source) --Enric Naval (talk) 15:52, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• weak Keep and blank. I won't totally oppose deletion, but I'm reluctant to totally delete something like this in the userspace unless it's actually a problem. -- Ned Scott 05:24, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I'm not. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 17:25, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - abandoned; using us as storage space. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:26, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• 'Keep and blank. No need for delete. DigitalC (talk) 06:29, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.