The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete all. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 12:25, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Minun/Drafts/Charizard[edit]

Userspace is not intended to "indefinitely host pages that look like articles". This draft was created nearly five years ago, and its author has not edited since October 2006. The article is not suited for mainspace since it is vastly inferior to the current (GA-level) version of Charizard. In short, this is a stale draft which can be deleted without any loss of useful information.

I also am including in this nomination the following two pages:

User:Minun/Species - compare to the various pages in Category:Lists of Pokémon
User:Minun/Pokémon Mansion - a draft about a non-notable fictional place

-- Black Falcon ^(talk) 19:54, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I also would call for the deletion of User:Minun/del and User:Minun/keep, which are boilerplate "delete/keep per nom" templates (without an option for specifying a rationale) whose use should be strongly discouraged. -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 19:59, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete User:Minun/Drafts/Charizard. A small part of Charizard created during a series of edits by the user to Charizard, 12 July 2006. Presumably as a sandbox. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:23, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.