The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. — xaosflux ^Talk 22:10, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Dusty articles[edit]

SvickBOT has stopped updating the list at Wikipedia:Dusty articles/List since 21 June 2015, and many of the articles in this list are no longer "dusty". GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 20:38, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. and reactivate. This is a useful list, and what we need is to maintain it, not remove it. DGG ( talk ) 03:00, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't this the same as Special:AncientPages? Either way, I'd guess mark as historical or revive if there's interest. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 00:15, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Revive. I have used this list from time to dust off articles, as for instance Bishops and archbishops of Bolnisi which was just a couple sentences when I found it, and several others. I have no idea what Special:AncientPages is but merge them if they identical. But if its not possible to revive, then I guess mark as historical rather than delete. Herostratus (talk) 02:55, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - There really is no reason why it needs to be deleted, however the outcome of this page depends on what will happen next. One outcome would be to revive this project, by supplementing a new bot that is able to update, or contacting the existing bot owners to see if they can try to revive the bot that stopped updating. Another would simply make this page historical. Hx7 14:13, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.