The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete without prejudice for speedy undeletion, recreation and/or moving at discretion or request of any Arbitrator or Clerk. — xaosflux ^Talk 03:36, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:List of banned users/Banned by the Arbitration Committee[edit]

The same policy-based reasons for the deletion of Wikipedia:List of banned users apply to this page also. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:07, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The Arbitration Committee is the group which should maintain such a list, and it is worth noting that since mid-2012, no one has been added to this list, which is heavily populated with names from 2010 and before. Note also that this list has not been well-maintained at all, with some now-unbanned users being still on the list. Collect (talk) 22:13, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: essentially a stale draft of the same information present in the "Banned by the Arbitration Committee" section of the recently deleted list of banned users. Since consensus was to delete that whole list, it follows that old copies of sections of that list should go too. Virtually nothing links to it, so it's likely no one is using it in any case. 28bytes (talk) 22:29, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have also taken a copy just in case the community might end up negatively impacted by the lack of any of this information being publicly available. (That was me using the page for a few seconds just now, and I've finished doing so.) --Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:35, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, or preferably, move to a subpage of Wikipedia:Arbitration, and let the arbs delete it. Arb actions should be recorded by the arbs or their clerks on their own pages. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:56, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it's the Arbitration Committee that should decide whether the page is to be deleted or retained, and that it should occur at a more appropriate venue. Iaritmioawp (talk) 12:08, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It appears to have been created by some guy User:Scott though (who he?), with no indication such creation was carried out under the authority of arbcom or their clerks. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 16:54, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.