The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Xoloz (talk) 15:40, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:No one really cares[edit]

Similar to the page deleted through Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:No one cares. Punkmorten (talk) 08:36, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't care er, I mean Userfy Tends to be acceptable per Wikipedia:Policies_and_guidelines#Essays_and_proposals, however Category:Wikipedia essays states "Essays in Wikipedia namespace that are mostly written by a single person, and not frequently referenced, are generally moved to the userspace of their author." Therefore, move it to User:AKMask/No one really cares. If in user space, no one will really care.--12 Noon ^2¢ 16:17, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The essay referenced was different from this one. And this one does come in handy, at least for me. It doesn't come up often, but when it does, generally, it's spot-on. I've no real objection to a userfy, though (and if the author doesn't want it, I'll take it). --UsaSatsui (talk) 17:34, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Useful advise, lots of pages go through deletion debates just because no one cares. IMO it's a good essay.--Phoenix-wiki 14:48, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - I was going to say userfy, since I too don't care, but since there may be a bidding war to see who gets to have it userfied to their userspace, it seems safe to conclude that enough people actually do care, and apparently actually reference the (can you really call seven sentences this) "essay" to justify keeping it where it is.--Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 04:18, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Bidding war? No, if the author wants it, he can have it. I'm just saying if he doesn't, I will foster it. If it gets usefied (I don't think it should) --UsaSatsui (talk) 16:35, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  Strong Keep - I just used it myself as part of a WP:3O where the two parties both "agree" with my comments except for the part that says, essentially, WP:CHILL - they just keep reverting each other stop watches in hand. It's gotta stay.--Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 05:46, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  Probably should've used Wikipedia:Don't-give-a-fuckism, would've worked better piped to "I don't care". :)--Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 13:22, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, apparently useful essay. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 15:13, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.