Billy Liddell

Previous peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

It's been extensively copyedited this past week as a prelude to a (hopeful) nomination for FA status. I'd intended to submit it for consideration almost 2 years ago, but that was postponed indefinitely after I curtailed my activity on Wikipedia. It's a relatively niche article that would really benefit from fresh assesment.

Cheers, SoLando (Talk) 21:55, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brianboulton comments: I grew up in Liverpool, and though Liddell was before my time, his name still resonated in the 70s and 80s, particularly as Liverpool were then the top football team of the era, no question. So it was interesting to read the article. Here are some issues that require attention, although I have not attempted a full prose check.

Lead
Early life
Career 1946-54
1954-61
International
Later life and legacy

I have not picked up on everything, and I reiterate my view that a thoughtful copyedit by fresh eyes would be of benefit. As I am not able to watch all my peer reviews, please leave queries/messages on my talkpage. Brianboulton (talk) 16:36, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


I really appreciate the suggestions and it's heartening to learn of your awareness of Liddell. I'm still in the process of implementing your recommendations, but most of the superficial issues highlighed have been resolved.
  • Sagar: Clarified?
  • Sentence structure in lead: Clarified?
Early life
  • There isn't that much exposition about his education, although Keith's biography does give reasonable attention to it. I've mentioned the subjects Liddell studies at Dunfermline.
  • I haven't been able to definitely ascertain whether "Scotland Schoolboys" is indeed a formal noun. There seems to be a lot of inconsistency, but examples of it being used as a noun are here in The Times and The Scotman, while the BBC and the Daily Mail illustrate the discrepancy.
  • Military service: There's no elaboration on the reason, only that service was deferred.
Career 1946-1954
  • I found that the passage on the volume of submitted applications put into an appropriate perspective, the significance of the club's achievement - and Liddell's importance to that. I've tried to contextualise its relevance. Is it worthy of retention?
  • While the level of detail probably does render elements of the prose peripheral, I'm convinced that much of it is still pertinent to the article. It provides context for Liddell's experiences and achivements on the pitch. I'll try to address it with a moderate expansion of Liddell's contribution to each season...even if that only entails mentioning his season tally. I've also begun to consolidate a few sentences, to address any imbalance. This also applies to the following section.
  • Thanks for alerting me to that. I'd begun to transition to the singular in my more recent copyedits, which I guess compounded the inconsistency.
  • I've rephrased the transfer sentence. He'd have certainly benefitted financially had he transferred to a more successful club or even moved abroad (where wage restrictions either didn't exist or were less draconian). Success with an English first division club would have been lucrative because of bonuses, etc, but unfortunately no sources could substantiate that...
1954-1961
  • I've added dates in paranthesis for the goalscorers. Cumbersome?
International:
  • In the process of rationalising the detail.
Later life
  • Unfortunately, there's no indication of how substantial it was. It was likely nominal...it may have been granted to him as a gift by the club in recognition of his services
  • I've contexualised the significance of the shirt. Hopefully it validates its inclusion.
Again, thank you! SoLando (Talk) 18:14, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]