Confederation of Madya-as

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I think this new article is a potential for re-classifying it as C or anywhere than Start. I am also a bit confused if this article is violating WP rules because many huge chunk of information were copy-pasted anywhere.

Thanks, JL 09 q?c 14:19, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brianboulton comments:-

The following extracts from the article's History section are exact or nearly exact copies of the wording in your online source. Please note that these are given as examples; there may well be other, similar extracts:-

In the whole article there is only one citation to the online source; none of the above statements are cited. This is plagiarism as defined by WP:Plagiarism. Any verbatim quotes from a source need to be in quotation marks and clearly cited. Such quotations should be short; in the main you should paraphrase the source information using your own words. If this is not clear to you, please contact my talkpage and I will try to explain further. The article cannot be reviewed until it has been substantially rewritten with proper regard to WP:Plagiarism. Brianboulton (talk) 00:28, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]