F.C. Porto in international club football

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because even though I think I have brought it to a good standard, I beleive there is always something that can be improved or errors that can be fixed and which my biased eyes can no longer detect.

Unlike similar articles, such as Liverpool F.C. in European football, I decided to name this article with a broader but more integrative title, since – unlike Liverpool – Porto have actually won titles of a more worldwide nature, thus not restricted to the European space and football. I raised this naming question at the WikiProject Football forum but no decision was reached, so I decided to make the move. I appreciate if reviewers can also discuss on this.

Thanks, Parutakupiu (talk) 01:10, 12 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Comments I'll do a quick pass in sections, and then a final run through hopefully!

The Rambling Man (talk) 18:07, 21 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Comments II

The Rambling Man (talk) 16:42, 22 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Comments III

The Rambling Man (talk) 15:28, 23 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Comments IV

How about if I switch "hangover" with "transition"? Can't think of anything better... Parutakupiu (talk) 02:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Changed to "players to clubs from prominent European leagues". Parutakupiu (talk) 02:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Reference added. Parutakupiu (talk) 02:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Rephrased that part. Parutakupiu (talk) 02:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Corrected. Parutakupiu (talk) 02:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Changed as suggested. Parutakupiu (talk) 02:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That season the Portuguese league had the possibility of qualifying directly their top two teams to the group stage, and the third to the qualifying round. Do you think it's important to add this explanation for this specific season? Parutakupiu (talk) 02:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Replaced with "signed". Parutakupiu (talk) 02:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Corrected. Will check other instances. Parutakupiu (talk) 02:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yeah, I don't have, so I'll change to a more encyclopedic style. Parutakupiu (talk) 02:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That's what I meant, "contained"... as in "less spectacular". Thanks for reminding me of the word. Parutakupiu (talk) 02:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Changed the three above. Parutakupiu (talk) 02:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Wow, I really exagerated with the journalistic tone, didn't I? Changed. Parutakupiu (talk) 02:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Will do. Parutakupiu (talk) 02:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Changed. Parutakupiu (talk) 02:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
No. Only the "by country" table had that in the source (which you've challenged, by the way). But I can add to the others. Parutakupiu (talk) 02:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
GD columns have been added. Parutakupiu (talk) 03:01, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, I didn't fix it because I'll probably have to remove it since the reliability of its sole source has been challenged by you and I couldn't find an alternative. Parutakupiu (talk) 02:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
OK, it is sorting well now, after a few dashes were replaced by minus signs. Parutakupiu (talk) 03:01, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Should the last round reached by a team be a sortable item? How to sort them: alphabetically or by progression level? It gets tricky with older tournaments, with rounds that were in time replaced or supplemented by others... Parutakupiu (talk) 02:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It is there, but only after the 1987 IC. Parutakupiu (talk) 02:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Will do so. Parutakupiu (talk) 02:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hyphens are now replaced by en-dashes where appropriate. Parutakupiu (talk) 03:01, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Rambling Man (talk) 17:35, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]