Metallica

Article was rewritten a month ago with fixes and corrections made the last few weeks. Plan to take it to FAC soon so would appreciate comments :)

Thanks,

M3tal H3ad (talk) 05:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

J Milburn

Not sure if there will be much to say this time around, but I'll see what I can do...

Some people bring up fair use logos in infoboxes up at FAC as they aren't critically addressed, which is why i removed it in the first place. There's a picture of the logo in early days M3tal H3ad (talk) 04:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Makes sense. I'll get out of the habit of adding it. J Milburn (talk) 13:50, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Removed it, pointless trivia, not notable enough M3tal H3ad (talk) 04:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
They were disrespecting Newsted, should this be reworded? M3tal H3ad (talk) 06:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that is what it says at the moment, but I was thrown due to the fact I was expecting it to talk about repect for Burton. I guess it is pretty obvious that ignoring musical ideas is disrespectful- how about simply saying "and his musical ideas were ignored by the band."? J Milburn (talk) 13:56, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say this is the best article I've peer reviewed, and certainly a topic worthy of being a featured article. Good luck! J Milburn (talk) 15:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So much for not much this time around ;p. Thanks again! FA in due time. M3tal H3ad (talk) 06:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]