Posting system

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I've completely overhauled it, and I would like to get it to at least GA quality. I believe that all the information that needs to be on the page is there in some form or another, I would just like to get the prose and grammar perfect, which can be hard when there are so many names, terms and technical jargon to juggle around. Any help perfecting it would be great!

Thanks, Torsodog (talk) 06:36, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ruhrfisch comments: Interesting article and good start on the way to GA, but still needs some work. Here are some suggestions for improvement:

I understand what you are saying here, but there is not much else to state about the other postings. Most of the postings were rather low-profile except Daisuke's. Ichiro's posting is over 8 years old now and it is hard to find information about the posting and bid. Torsodog (talk) 20:23, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hope this helps, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 00:55, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]