Qwest Field

Previous peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
The writing needs improvement. Any feedback would be appreciated. It recieved decent support for promotion to FA but the writing was a dealbreaker.Cptnono (talk) 06:43, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Cptnono (talk) 06:43, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. I didn't realize that I need to wait 14 days. Apologies for not reading the intro closer. this needs to be closed.Cptnono (talk) 08:54, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
WP:PR/V has people willing to do copyedits. I have closed this per your request - it would be OK to reopen this in 14 days - ask if you do not know how to do that. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 13:39, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have reopened the PR as requested. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 17:20, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome. Just to clarify, the primary goal of this PR is to get the writing up to the standards of FA. There has been another round of work done, but I don't want there to be any concerns upon its renomination. Any feedback is appreciated.Cptnono (talk) 01:23, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Crimsonfox's Comments

I hope these comments help. I'll temp watch this PR if you have any questions. CrimsonFox talk 20:09, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome. Thanks for the help. The only thing not changed was [Wild card (sports)]].Cptnono (talk) 08:15, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]