The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:42, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have seen this image in an oficial magazine from Grand Central. In fact this image provides a better image tthan the magazine! See here Simply south (talk) 01:12, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:42, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
contradictory statements - source "taken from tv" with "self" as (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 06:42, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:03, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The subject of this image, the text, is copyrighted. — neuro(talk)(review) 08:04, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:42, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Low res, no meta-data, border, obviously taken during a match. Probably taken from another website. J Milburn (talk) 11:55, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
license is public domain, but where is the monkey and snow picture from? Otterathome (talk) 12:05, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
((pd-art)) does not apply to statues, where the photographer has freedom to choose angles and whatnot- it is not merely a simple reproduction. J Milburn (talk) 12:09, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Subject of photo is not the subject of article it's used in (Thomas Verne Washington, who can be seen on his own website here), has a Corbis watermark in the top left (therefore arguably non-free and definitely not CC as the image page suggests). My deduction is that it was used for subtle vandalism - it was uploaded 18:36, 2 January 2009, added to the article 18:38, 2 January 2009 in an infobox with other false information (that disagreed with the body of the article) and the uploader has previously vandalised WP. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 13:33, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Kept, retagged correctly. Stifle (talk) 10:20, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Whilst the source is GPL, I am unable to locate any notice that the logo is also GPL. — neuro(talk)(review) 15:13, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:03, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Website states "©2009 dmoz.org.in . All rights reserved. dmoz.org.in(FDP) ". — neuro(talk)(review) 15:14, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:02, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Screenshot of copyrighted TV program. — neuro(talk)(review) 19:31, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Mfield (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:10, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Copyvio, [1] [2] [3] — neuro(talk)(review) 20:36, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:02, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image is listed as GFDL, however it is based on a copyrighted anime, so this seems unlikely. NanohaA'sYuriTalk, My master 21:36, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:02, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
the source is probably not free Hidro (talk) 22:25, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Kept, now properly tagged as non-free with a rationale. Stifle (talk) 10:21, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image is claimed as GFDL, however it is a photograph of a copyrighted Transformers character. NanohaA'sYuriTalk, My master 22:37, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:42, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image as listed as being "use it for any purpose", however it is a picture of a copyrighted Zoids figurine. NanohaA'sYuriTalk, My master 22:43, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Cited source does not exist; unable to verify license (ESkog)(Talk) 23:09, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cited source does not exist; unable to verify license (ESkog)(Talk) 23:09, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Nyttend (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cited source does not exist; unable to verify license (ESkog)(Talk) 23:10, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cited source does not exist; unable to verify license (ESkog)(Talk) 23:10, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cited source does not exist; unable to verify license (ESkog)(Talk) 23:10, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cited source does not exist; unable to verify license (ESkog)(Talk) 23:11, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cited source does not exist; unable to verify license (ESkog)(Talk) 23:11, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cited source does not exist; unable to verify license (ESkog)(Talk) 23:11, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cited source does not exist; unable to verify license (ESkog)(Talk) 23:11, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cited source does not exist; unable to verify license (ESkog)(Talk) 23:11, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cited source does not exist; unable to verify license (ESkog)(Talk) 23:12, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cited source does not exist; unable to verify license (ESkog)(Talk) 23:12, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cited source does not exist; unable to verify license (ESkog)(Talk) 23:12, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cited source does not exist; unable to verify license (ESkog)(Talk) 23:12, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cited source does not exist; unable to verify license (ESkog)(Talk) 23:12, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cited source does not exist; unable to verify license (ESkog)(Talk) 23:13, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cited source does not exist; unable to verify license (ESkog)(Talk) 23:13, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cited source does not exist; unable to verify license (ESkog)(Talk) 23:13, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cited source does not exist; unable to verify license (ESkog)(Talk) 23:13, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:42, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unless the uploader is a professional photographer who for some reason wants to keep his name anonymous, he is not the copyright holder of this image. 216.93.215.181 (talk) 00:05, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]