The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:20, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DingoBlueB.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• corporate logo; no source; if legit uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 00:47, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:48, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:100558632.GwWX5kw0.VA2949.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• provided template does not equal watermark - no link to uploader Skier Dude (talk) 02:55, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:42, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:PossVictims.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I'm not sure images from the LA County Sheriff's office are in the public domain. Ricky81682 (talk) 09:13, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Original image not free, deleted. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:42, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Twilight Apple.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As of this revision, the now-retired uploader stated the image was taken by "Brian Arthur". I thought this sounded odd, so I Googled his name, and came up with this. From a website that states on it's "about" page, "All images are copyrighted by their owners." I doubt of all places to upload an image you want to be free to the web, a user would upload it to this website that has that statement. ς ح д r خ є 11:46, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, why wasn't this uploaded to the Commons? The uploader of this image obviously did not have much experience in the image area. ς ح д r خ є 11:48, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Kept. License changed to CC-BY-3.0 and required attribution included. Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:05, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Starsinthesky.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This image was posted with a public domain license and no information about the source. However, a little research shows that it came from the European Space Agency and has a copyright. It may still be okay to retain, but I'm requesting that somebody check whether the ESA copyright can be used on wikipedia (as it is not the same as the NASA copyright). Thanks. RJH (talk) 18:17, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information on where it originally came from. The source where I found and downloaded the picture was on photobucket.com so I would think it would be OK and now there is a more brief summary on it and I changed the licensing to NASA but if there is one on ESA just let me know. So permission to remove the possibly unfree box. Thank you! Jhenderson777 (talk) 19:28, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In reading the copyright page, it says that the image is released under the "Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported," rather than the NASA public domain license.—RJH (talk) 21:59, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:39, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DU Flag.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Flag claimed as own work. Bad thing. ZooFari^Boo! 21:29, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.