The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:30, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lizzie Borden.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I doubt that the copyright for this image is held by the uploader, and it is not used in any articles. Wildhartlivie (talk) 04:16, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:30, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lizzie Bordens Sister.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is another photo for which uploader claims to own the copyright. Because an image is purchased somewhere, it does not mean the purchaser owns the copyright. The photo is unused in articles. Wildhartlivie (talk) 04:20, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Collage self-evidently contain material protected by Crown Copyright. Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:54, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Infantry.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• May be Crown Copyright in parts Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Which part(s) do you claim are not in the public domain?--Elvey (talk) 23:30, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Specfic Insignia design may be protected under Crown Copyright rules.. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:00, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't answer my question. You don't claim that they all are, some are, or one is. You don't claim to have, or cite any information. In fact, you don't make a claim at all. You are supposed make a claim, i.e. dispute something when you create an entry here. But you didn't do so, so I removed tag; feel free to restore it if appropriate. --Elvey (talk) 12:51, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:30, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Klangbus.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Delete: Uploader has failed to provide a working url yet claims copyright. Though the image is a decent size, not a small resolution web image, there is no metadata and I cannot find this image on the website which claims copyright on the main page. ww2censor (talk) 15:14, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:30, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Budokkelate.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Delete: Uploader has failed to provide a working url yet claims copyright. Though the image is a reasonable size, not a small resolution web image, there is no metadata and I cannot find this image on the website which claims copyright on this page http://www.utusan.com.my/utusan/special.asp?pr=theMessenger ww2censor (talk) 15:16, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:30, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kotaraya.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Delete: Uploader has failed to provide a working url yet claims copyright. The image is a small resolution web image, there is no metadata and I cannot find this image on the website which claims copyright on the main page. ww2censor (talk) 15:18, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:30, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pertama.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Delete: Uploader has failed to provide a working url yet claims copyright. The image is a small resolution web image, there is no metadata and I cannot find this image on the website which claims copyright on the main page. ww2censor (talk) 15:18, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:30, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cmarket.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Delete: Uploader has failed to provide a working url yet claims copyright. The image is a small resolution web image, there is no metadata and I cannot find this image on the website which claims copyright on the main page. ww2censor (talk) 15:19, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Deleted. Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:52, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barqsrootbeer.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Product Artwork - Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:17, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:30, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alwaeli.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Doesn't feel right to me; he was, after all, dead by 2008. Also, virtually certainly predated by usage at a number of sites, including [1]. - Jarry1250 ^{[Humorous? Discuss.]} 20:45, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:51, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Health Care Costs and Savings.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Looks like a scan from a report or PDF; unlikely uploader's own work. At any rate, contains only information which would be solely representable in textual form. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:15, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Firefox DOM Inspector.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Orphaned screenshot of a program, no indication that the uploader owns the copyright. — ξ^xplicit 23:54, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • You mean to the program? It's Firefox, probably should be tagged as per File:Firefox-DOM-Inspector-en.png, which I think is just a newer version of the same thing. - Jarry1250 ^{[Humorous? Discuss.]} 19:02, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.