The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:43, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
uploader claims that this is the logo from his school. Does not have any license templated - would appreciate confirmation through WP:OTRS if this is not templated as ((non-free logo)) with the appropriate fair use Skier Dude (talk) 03:54, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by MBisanz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:21, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image has an unverified GFDL tag and a fair use rationale; one of these must be wrong. Stifle (talk) 11:52, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:45, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned file. only contribution of uploader. no encyclopedic context. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 12:57, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: kept w/license corrected Skier Dude (talk) 01:02, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Uploader is not copyright holder Rettetast (talk) 13:35, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
oppose deletion copyright tag fixed. the picture is a 118 years old Eli+ 16:52, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:43, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"i made it myself". But the uploader is in the photo, participating in a triathlon, so that is unlikely. Also cannot be fair use, as we don't allow fair use for living people. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 14:10, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: keep. Proper licensing provided. — ξxplicit 05:47, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
PD-self seems unlikely (check file history). Image is claimed to be available since 1920, but no source is given. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:38, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:43, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This image and the others listed below were uploaded by a serial copyright infringer and sock abuser. I have verified duplication of some of the images s/he has uploaded from http://tamilnila.webnode.com/gallery/ and accordingly deleted them. These also need evaluation, particularly given the similar "shadowing" around the edges. This contributor has, under his or her main account, also uploaded images to Commons that were blatantly pasted from various websites under the claim that they were his or her own. Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:50, 5 October 2009 (UTC) Included in this listing:[reply]