The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:56, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Professional-looking map uploaded by a user with a spotty history on image copyright concerns and no clear indication that it was self-made. kmccoy (talk) 05:24, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:56, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks very much like a promo shot, found at least one smaller version of this online after a quick Google search[1]. Sherool (talk) 07:18, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:56, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

With no statement about the uploader taking this photo, and considering the other imagery uploaded by this user, I consider all of their contribs to be suspect and worth looking into. kmccoy (talk) 07:32, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:56, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Same as my issues above, this user seems to have just gone around the web and grabbed images for upload. There's no consistent quality to his images, and this one, unlike the others, has EXIF data indicating it was taken by a Canon 20D. I am skeptical that this user took this image. I'd much rather see it replaced and deleted. kmccoy (talk) 08:06, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:52, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

no evidence this fits commons:Template:PD-Mexico or that it is public domain in the US anyway Magog the Ogre (talk) 16:40, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• As per PD-Mexico this image's copyright was transferred to the Government of the State of Puebla along with the Club's copyright memorabilia and historic memory (including photographic; for all items created prior to July 10, 1989) both by and 'Acto de Cabildo' -July 12, 1989- and later confirmed in the Diario Oficial (I do not have the current date of the publication of the DOF but will look into it). The Government of Puebla has released this Archive for all non-commercial uses. Signed J Abed F.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:52, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

see above Magog the Ogre (talk) 16:41, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• As per PD-Mexico this image's copyright was transferred to the Government of the State of Puebla along with the Club's copyright memorabilia and historic memory (including photographic; for all items created prior to July 10, 1989) both by and 'Acto de Cabildo' -July 12, 1989- and later confirmed in the Diario Oficial (I do not have the current date of the publication of the DOF but will look into it). The Government of Puebla has released this Archive for all non-commercial uses. Signed J Abed F.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:52, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

((PD-UK)) does not apply. Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:17, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The school has used this picture freely for over 60 years. I, as guardian of the picture, ie the school's Archivist, release it to the public domain. G N Frykman

Would like to see WP:OTRS for this Skier Dude (talk) 02:41, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:52, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PD does not apply Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:19, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• As per PD-Mexico this image's copyright was transferred to the Government of the State of Puebla along with the Club's copyright memorabilia and historic memory (including photographic; for all items created prior to July 10, 1989) both by and 'Acto de Cabildo' -July 12, 1989- and later confirmed in the Diario Oficial (I do not have the current date of the publication of the DOF but will look into it). The Government of Puebla has released this Archive for all non-commercial uses. Signed J Abed F.

Sadly, non-commercial uses are too restrictive for the Wikipedia copyright. Magog the Ogre (talk) 14:15, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:52, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

no evidence that the said site owns the copyright on this image, or even if it does, that the copyright holder has passed away long enough ago to put into PD. Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:21, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:52, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence this passes commons:Template:PD-Armenia. Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:55, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:52, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

poor sourcing, no date information on when/by whom this was taken Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:09, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept and flagged as ((PD-Australia)). Copyright has clearly expired - Peripitus (Talk) 02:40, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

reproduction rights are too restrictive for CC-SA Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:24, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I'm pretty sure that all photos taken either by Australians or in England during World War I are out of copyright by now Nick-D (talk) 09:51, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Can we show they were published soon after being taken? In that case, they would be ((PD-US-1923-abroad)). Magog the Ogre (talk) 15:42, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• The photographer, R. C. Strangman, was an Australian. This should therefore be in the public domain per ((PD-Australia)). IronGargoyle (talk) 15:47, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:56, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

According to source website, "© North Hobart Football Club Inc. 2009. All Rights Reserved worldwide." J Milburn (talk) 18:31, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:52, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

organization logo, no proof uploader is (c) holder or was released as CC Skier Dude (talk) 21:20, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:52, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

organization logo, no proof uploader is (c) holder or was released as CC Skier Dude (talk) 21:20, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.