The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy Deleted

File:Overview-gallery4-20090828.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No permission, from: http://www.apple.com/macbookpro. OSX (talk • contributions) 10:11, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy Deleted

File:New iMac.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No evidence that this user owns the copyright of the image. Copied from http://www.apple.com/imac/ Theleftorium ^(talk) 10:43, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy Deleted

File:Mac Pro.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No evidence that this user owns the copyright of the image. Copied from http://www.apple.com/macpro/

Theleftorium ^(talk) 10:44, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy Deleted

File:Ipad hero4 20100127.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No evidence that this user owns the copyright of the image. Copied from http://www.apple.com/ipad/ Theleftorium ^(talk) 10:46, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy deleted. Orderinchaos 05:04, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jw-yr-voyage.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Its fairly clear that this is from Google, taken from http://jessicawatson.com.au/the-voyage with Google Earth Browser Plugin activated. It is therefore under copyright and not suitable for a PD tag. –Moondyne 10:47, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Image is public domain. It uses satellite imagery from the US Government. No copyrighted imagery was used in this image. It was not created using the Google Earth Browser Plugin. Watertower (talk) 13:56, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • fascinating. And I see an identical image on my screen using the url above, including the purple halo, the random white dots in the black background and so on. Exactly how did you create the image? –Moondyne 14:07, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      • I used Google Earth. Not sure how much more "exact" you need me to be. What's important is that the images are not from Google (they are from the US Government, and are public domain), and the use of software does not give copyright to the company which produced the software. If I had used Adobe Illustrator, would you claim that Adobe had copyright on the image? Watertower (talk) 15:19, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
        • The provenance of the image data is immaterial. Google Earth images and their derivatives are copyright; here's a self-reference. I can't find a WMF policy statement on this but I presume that there is one somewhere. –Moondyne 00:36, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
          • You shouldn't believe everything you read on Wikipedia. The portion of the image which I copied was not copyrighted by anyone except me. Watertower (talk) 01:25, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy Deleted

File:HP MediaSmart Server.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No evidence that this user owns the copyright of the image. Copied from http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/07/microsoft-announces-hp-mediasmart-server-powered-by-windows-home/ or some other website. Theleftorium ^(talk) 10:51, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy Deleted

File:HP MediaSmart Server.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No evidence that this user owns the copyright of the image. Copied from http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/07/microsoft-announces-hp-mediasmart-server-powered-by-windows-home/ or some other website. Theleftorium ^(talk) 10:51, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:14, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:StrongSideHS.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• GFDL Self claim - but no indication uploader is connected to MLG site listed? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:56, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy Deleted

File:MacBook Pro.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Copied from http://images.apple.com/macbookpro/images/overview-gallery4-20090828.png. No evidence that the user created the image. Theleftorium ^(talk) 12:34, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy Deleted

File:Microsoft Mouse & Keyboard.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Copied from http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/03/7000w.jpg (see TinEye search: http://www.tineye.com/search/4fdbb383b317154d8a7769a774786fbc26095900). No evidence that the user created the image. Theleftorium ^(talk) 12:37, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:14, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ajith kumar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• just because its from a fansite, doesnt mean that it is not copyright. http://www.ajithfans.com/news/2008/11/12/ajiths-experiment-with-a-different-director/ 207.69.137.27 (talk) 15:59, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 05:04, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PLAYA MARSELLA NICARAGUA.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• reason this image is non-free
• ESTA FOTO NO ESTÁ EN DOMINIO PÚBLICO. APARECE AQUÍ POR UN ABUSO. POR FAVOR, ABSTÉNGASE DE UTILIZARLA. ESTA PROTEGIDA POR LOS DERECHOS DE AUTOR DE SU TITULAR Q.URTECHO 200.62.106.103 (talk) 17:09, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note, someone has made this same claim in April. MM207.69.137.23 (talk) 19:01, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. No evidence provided for the image being unfree. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:27, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep- No reason for me to believe it is unfree.--SKATER ^Hmm? 15:49, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:14, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wahapov.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The image is very highly to be created by the user, consider this person has died in 1962. Also, due to the recent change of copyright in Russia, anything since 1941 (the start of the Great Patriotic War), will have copyright attached to it. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 19:47, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:14, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cihanov.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Does not qualify for public domain in Russia and lack of permissions from photographer. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 20:10, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:14, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carolinelucas-mp2.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image is cropped from an image on Flickr that is licensed under CC-NC, i.e. no commercial use allowed. This is not compatible with Wikipedia's license.

See http://www.flickr.com/photos/rupert_read/3081488429/sizes/o/ Fences&Windows 21:36, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I've mailed the author to ask his input to the matter. Trev M ~  22:46, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fine, he might relicense it for Wikipedia. The uploader is a serial offender on image license problems, I just blocked them for removing possibly unfree file notices from two images immediately after I gave them a final warning about their image uploads. Fences&Windows 20:28, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 05:03, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Equilibrium,by ReissGames,Inc.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Toy/Puzzle design - so would be non-free ? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:02, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The toy/puzzle looks to be functional in its design. It would be patentable, I think, but not copyrightable (like a Rubick's Cube). IronGargoyle (talk) 00:41, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Per IronGargoyle.--SKATER ^Hmm? 16:05, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:14, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Linwood-Barclay.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image is stolen and cropped from an all rights reserved image on Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/32773173@N00/3045695379/ Fences&Windows 22:10, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete- No reason to believe that it is a free image, if the author were too change the license then we'll talk.--SKATER ^Hmm? 15:52, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:14, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Martin Brest.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image was taken from another website, is not the user's work (has uploaded other stolen images): http://www.tribute.ca/people/Martin+Brest/1393 Fences&Windows 22:11, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:14, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:CarolineLucasMP-GreenParty.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image is stolen from Flickr where it is posted with all rights reserved: http://www.flickr.com/photos/solarider/152632884/ Fences&Windows 22:15, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:14, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clublandclassix2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Plainly this is a non-free image that the user does not own the copyright to, and it is high resolution. Fences&Windows 22:18, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete-No way uploader made this, high resolution, fails nonfree criteria as well as free.--SKATER ^Hmm? 16:02, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:14, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mithun Poojari.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not sure about a self claim- this looks like promo artwork? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:23, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment-Depends on what article this is being used for, it looks like it could be some garage band that someone took a photo of and messed with in photoshop.--SKATER ^Hmm? 16:04, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:14, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vispy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Watermark in image makes me skeptical about a self claim Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:27, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:14, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pradeep Miranda.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photo style suggests promo artwork - given previous uploads from this uploader I'm skepeitcal about a self-claim Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:30, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:14, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Veeru.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Style of photo suggest promo photo - Given past uploads of the uploader - I'm skeptical about a self claim Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:31, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.