The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Columbiaville Depot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The source does not appear to be free Jay8g (talk) 00:29, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:14, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Walter Rotman Auditorium wall.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Delete: the uploader is obviously not the copyright holder because this is a slavish copy of a 2D image but we don't know who holds the copyright. The subject was alive from 1922-2007, so even if the image was published, it is likely still in copyright but again without more information we should err on the side of caution. ww2censor (talk) 04:45, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Legalthriller.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Legalthriller.png. Procedural nomination on my part; I am neutral. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:43, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miroslav Lajčák.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This does not fit in one of the criteria to be exempt from copyright in Bosnia. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 06:57, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Raffi Gregorian.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This does not fit in one of the criteria to be exempt from copyright in Bosnia. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 06:58, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alma Adamkiene with Kateryna Yushchenko.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unused image; photographs of news events are not covered under the PD-Ukraine template. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 07:40, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Princeglyph.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Copyrighted symbol, orphaned. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Prince_logo.svg User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 10:40, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:53, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Word Alive EP.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No evidence that the upload holds the rights. Eeekster (talk) 12:58, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:14, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F5 by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:21, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:MIW Demo.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• License claim not compatible with FUR. Eeekster (talk) 13:07, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:14, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:54, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fallen angels bvb.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not likely to be free art licensed. Eeekster (talk) 13:24, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:14, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:La200-3.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photo is tagged as PD-Russia 2008, which requires that it must have been taken before 1 January 1943, but the aircraft in question, the La-200, did not exist at that time, design only starting in 1948 and the aircraft not flying until 1949 Nigel Ish (talk) 23:08, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:I AM EQUAL photo - participant1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photographer: Matt Spencer and his page (given in the deleted version of this image) indicated all rights reserved. Eeekster (talk) 23:56, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, uploader has attempted multiple subsequent uploads from the same series, declared as non-free, so it's clear he is not acting on behalf of the copyright holder. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:21, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• File deleted for improper license but I hold that this page should not be deleted because of Fair Use: Image is from the publicly accessible project photo gallery (http://photo.iamequalproject.org) and a free version can not be created due to logo and photographic trademarks held by Jason Beckett, Matt Spencer, and the I AM EQUAL Foundation. Images from the gallery have been freely used in newspapers, blogs, social media, and TV news reports across the US. I changed the license and added the appropriate non-free use template and rationale to the file. Steinway1701 (talk) 10:15, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• File has formally correct non-free tagging now, so this PUF issue is moot. However, I'm going to challenge its use under WP:NFCC#8, in a different venue. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:15, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.