The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: wrong forum - I have tagged it as no source, no rationale, and orphaned fair use --B (talk) 01:52, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:STO Map.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This map of the United Federation of Planets is non free and I contend not that useful. It would be useful if the average reader could read a map of the galaxy. I doubt that is possible. I will say it is quite cool, but that is beside the point. Dbrodbeck (talk) 03:50, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note the image does not claim to be freely licensed - there is a (rather questionable) fair use justification. Thparkth (talk) 18:43, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Van Cao piano.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source is the image on vi.wikipedia, however the image was deleted from vi.wikipedia, and this image is marked as under copyright. Don't know how to contact admins at vi.wikipedia, and IRC stewards didn't answer when I asked them for help, so this is the only option, sorry. Sven Manguard Wha? 07:10, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have received confirmation from multiple sources, most recently a vi.wikipedia admin, that this did not have a source on vi.wikipedia either. Sven Manguard Wha? 19:51, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:NYU ES Flags.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No evidence of permission given at official website http://eucleiansociety.blogspot.com/. DrKiernan (talk) 13:50, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Petrol.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Petrol.PNG Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:02, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roseville Hey D 1a.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Roseville Hey D 1.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:15, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mariborlandmarks.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This image is comprised of five files, but the Author only lists four original files. The fifth is not CC-BY-SA licenced, as far as I can tell. In addition, this file is released under CC0 - which I don't believe it can be, as some of the original works are CC-BY-SA. The Cavalry (Message me) 21:36, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Well the re-license is not correct. File:Spomenik_Rudolfu_Maistru.JPG is licensed via ((Cc-by-sa-3.0)), it is not in PD. And, yes, there is one image not listed as to source. As it is right now it carries an invalid license and needs to be deleted. They have also uploaded other similar images. Soundvisions1 (talk) 22:39, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.