The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:09, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kingtarhua.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kingtarhua.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 16:08, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. PD-art does not apply for 3D works. Has been deleted on Commons. --MGA73 (talk) 09:03, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:09, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tmoneycards seoul southkorea.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photograph of copyrighted item. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 20:33, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Design of the cards is copyrighted. This is a derivative work. --MGA73 (talk) 09:05, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:El Fresno.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Marked with cc-by-2.0, but listed at Panoramio as "All rights reserved" with no evidence of permission at Wikipedia. Poster is almost certainly the photo creator, and has been informed on his talk page of how to give permission here, but has so far chosen not to do so. TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 21:44, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A new version has been uploaded on top of the old. It's possible that the old needs to be rev/del'ed. --Danger (talk) 00:30, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The new photo also comes from Panoramio [1]. The Panoramio page says, "© All Rights Reserved by Poncho_El Fresno". —Bkell (talk) 18:09, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I reassert the nomination as to both the old image and the new image, both for the same reason. — TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 14:38, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there's now a third image, which doesn't seem to come from the same set of Panoramio pictures as the others. However, it has no licensing information. —Bkell (talk) 14:57, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend and nominate the two prior images for RevDel and recommend that the current, third, image only be deleted if the poster fails to add licensing information by Sunday, 13 February 2011. Regards, TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 21:53, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The poster has now added licensing templates to the current image (unfortunately two conflicting ones, though either will work here), so I recommend that the two older images be RevDel'ed and I withdraw the nomination for the current image. — TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 14:43, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and move to Commons. If the uploader is the photographer it does not matter what license the photo have on panoramio. I see no reason to think that the uploader is not the potographer. As for the old versions I think we should just delete them when new file has been moved to Commons. --MGA73 (talk) 09:01, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.

You guy's don't have the rights to delete that file, Traveling to Mexico Was not easy! Taking a picture of that place wasn't easy also! You guy's Violated The use of free Image Hosting! So User must Upload that image again and the Web Panoramio is under my account with my ((OWN)) Images so I shared it also with Wikipedia. So I'm still wondering why you guys making a huge fuss over my Image! Needing License? Yes it's under my own license!