The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 09:08, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nawalapitiya st2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• no permission got from the original author to upload to wikipedia. copyright violation නිපුන දොඩන්තැන්න (talk) 08:17, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chernyahovsky ID.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Without proper sourcing - it is impossible to verify licence. Bulwersator (talk) 11:21, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chemical warfare warningboard iran.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unused, there is no freedom of panorama in Iran, part of image is removed Bulwersator (talk) 15:05, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F3 by Infrogmation (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:04, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:LSU AP Trophy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Obvious copyright violation - metadata credits photo to: REUTERS/Sean Gardner (UNITED STATES) Mosmof (talk) 15:29, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Deleted, obvious blatant copyright violation. -- Infrogmation (talk) 21:35, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:John Pelphrey.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The image also appears on Flickr at http://www.flickr.com/photos/tipsterhog/1768022973/ with a ((Cc-by-nd-nc)) license, which is incompatible with Wikipedia and contradicts the public domain note on the file. License should be corrected on Flickr or the Flickr user should provide an OTRS permission. Also applies to a cropped version of the photo, File:John Pelphrey headshot.jpg. Mosmof (talk) 15:55, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Black velvet painting.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photo of a painting and that makes it a derivative work. MGA73 (talk) 16:20, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cromleh's Official Logo (2005-2007).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "This is the logo that the band Cromleh has officially been using since the year 2005." The logo is probably copyrighted and we need a permission or better proof that uploader is the copyright holder. It is unused so fair use is not a good option. MGA73 (talk) 16:22, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:DePuewelcome.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Copy of a sign. Derivative work. If this is in the US there is no FOP for 2D works. MGA73 (talk) 16:23, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:DiscoveryStumpInfo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of what looks like a sign. MGA73 (talk) 16:24, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:FineScan12149373.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Orphan image. No source mentioned. The name and looks of the file indicate that it is a scan. Who is the photographer? MGA73 (talk) 16:27, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:36, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Goddess Diana hunting.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Statue in Brookgreen Gardens (the US). No FOP for statues. How old is the statue? Is there a copyright notice? MGA73 (talk) 16:29, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wait... Per File:Brookgreen_Gardens_Sculpture23.jpg it is from 1924. --MGA73 (talk) 16:32, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:KISS-mas ornament.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unused. Probably derivative work of a copyrighted work. MGA73 (talk) 16:38, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Odyssey2005.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photo of a painting - derivative work. Why created the painting? Unused. MGA73 (talk) 16:42, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. This is not de minimis by any means. The entire map is copyrighted, and using a section of said map doesn't change that fact. — ξ^xplicit 00:38, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ROCLINCOURT TRENCH MAP.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Trench line is probably PD-user but I am unsure about map - is it copyrighted? Bulwersator (talk) 17:26, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• After extensive research taken from the book Topography of Armageddon, A British Trench Map Atlas by Peter Chasseaud, the green line shown on this map was imposed on to this modern map of the area by myself. The map in itself is only a very small section of a modern French Cart Topographique 1 : 2500 by IGM France and I am sure doesn’t breach copyright as it is only a small part/section of the whole map.

 stavros1  ♣  20:39, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• • I think that use of map here is too significant to pass as de minimis, but maybe fair use will be OK Bulwersator (talk) 21:17, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Baptism of Jesus in Nativity Chapel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative of probably unfree painting Bulwersator (talk) 21:39, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:NormanLacyAlanHuntW200.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Web resolution - it is unlikely for own work - scanned analog photo (image is from 1980) Bulwersator (talk) 21:59, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.