The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:13, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:13, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: keep per discussion on Commons. ((Non-free Philippines government)) would appear to be incorrect, so nominating that template for deletion seems like a suitable option. — ξxplicit 23:42, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
((PD-PhilippinesGov))
require it to have been made at national level (as in the United States) or are also works of a local government in the public domain? The image appears here but there is no licensing information available. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:45, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
((PD-Philippines|commons))
into ((PD-Art|PD-Philippines))
. But what is ((non-free Philippines government))
supposed to mean? It looks contradictory to ((PD-PhilippinesGov))
. Asked at Commons:COM:VPC#Philippine government. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:46, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
((PD-US-unpublished))
doesn't apply, so it seems to be copyrighted in the United States. The country of origin appears to be the United Kingdom and it seems that it is in the public domain there based on the special photo rules mentioned at Commons:COM:L#Ordinary copyright. Stefan2 (talk) 14:57, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete based on the precautionary principle without prejudice to recreation if the uploader can give a compelling explanation of how s/he is so close to the subject, and why his/her photos were uploaded to other sites beforehand. As is, it's a bit sketchy. If the uploader comes back and sees this discussion and wants to give it another try but is uncomfortable explaning his/her close relationship with the subject publicly (e.g., close friend, family member, the subject himself), feel free to contact me via email or send it privately via email via Wikipedia:Contact us/Photo submission. I apologize if I have indeed deleted legitimately licensed content and I'm just making the process more difficult. Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:55, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]