The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:07, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Johnnyjack.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• NFL logo is a copyright violation. Eeekster (talk) 02:06, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:07, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stlclippers primarylogo.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work from the Los Angeles Clippers logo. Eeekster (talk) 02:09, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:07, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:STLclippers complete3.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Composite from copyright protected images. Eeekster (talk) 02:10, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:07, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Panther 6 white.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Quite obviously from a printed source and not the work of the uploader. Eeekster (talk) 02:14, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• i folded it it is not from a printed aource i am sorry yes i am willing to seek consensus and i have read the edit warring policy (talk) 11:29, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:07, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Giantcrab.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of the pictured sculpture/topiary. Powers ^T 02:30, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:07, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madhu ( Actor).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Probably not the work of the uploader, especially with the history of ignoring copyrights. Eeekster (talk) 03:15, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:07, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sindhi pathans.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Might actually be PD but the reason given appears to be nonsense. Eeekster (talk) 03:25, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Seriously. Do some research before doing what you're doing, Eeekster. It's getting really old. This photograph was taken by John Burke (who died in 1900). The source can be changed to the British Library. The photo is public domain.Ctoshw (talk) 23:39, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Note After Eeekster listed this file here, our uploader decided to upload an entirely new image, with entirely new people, an entirely new landscape, and no swords. Shortly afterward, we had to indef block the uploader for (among other things, like harassing Eeekster) serial uploading of file upon file with the same title but different images (plus some other stuff that was 'to come' - the deletion log is odd). I wasn't part of that particular kerfuffle, but he just ignored the source info on some other files, so they were tagged under F4 and I deleted them, which is how I made my way to this kerfuffle. In other words, we really don't know who these people in the images are, we don't know when/where it was taken, and the two images were uploaded by a user who is now indef blocked.
  Yeah, it's probably in the PD - but it's going to get tagged and likely deleted for lack of sourcing. We don't just source PD textual additions to the Podunk Times because we want to keep them. We don't just source PD images to the British Library or anywhere else because we want to keep them, either. - KrakatoaKatie 08:31, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:07, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:SXHS-VP School Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Logo does not belong to the uploader Eeekster (talk) 19:03, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Is the logo of an organization and comes under fair use (This is an official logo of an entity that is the subject of a Wikipedia article. It will be included as that entity's primary means of visual identification, at the top of the article in question). Instead of marking all these images for deletion, why not actually be useful and fix the licenses that can be fixed?Ctoshw (talk) 23:35, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:07, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:St. Xavier's High School, Vile Parla, Mumbai, India - Emblem.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• School logo, not the property of the uploader Eeekster (talk) 19:05, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Is the logo of an organization and comes under fair use (This is an official logo of an entity that is the subject of a Wikipedia article. It will be included as that entity's primary means of visual identification, at the top of the article in question). Instead of marking all these images for deletion, why not actually be useful and fix the licenses that can be fixed?Ctoshw (talk) 23:35, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep, uploader's explanation seems alright. Assuming good faith for lack of a better deletion rationale. — ξ^xplicit 03:38, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:PX-Trunk Murderess House.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Scan of printed source. Eeekster (talk) 19:26, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - This claim is absolutely false. I took this picture and I am the copyright holder. I have taken many photos of historical places in and around Phoenix which can be found in Wikipedia, such as those found here: Gallery of Historic Structures in Phoenix, Arizona. I kindly request that you remove your nomination.Tony the Marine (talk) 02:47, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would also like to point out something here because it seems to me that the nominator lacks certain knowledge in this issue. In order to upload in Wikipedia an image which you have taken from your private collection you must first scan it to your computer then upload it to Wikipedia. Printed source? Sorry, but there is no printed source as claimed. Tony the Marine (talk) 01:20, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.