The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:1975 Monza 2+2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No verifiable source Bulwersator (talk) 10:51, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:1976 Vegas Durabilty Run.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No verifiable source Bulwersator (talk) 10:52, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:50 Deluxe Styleline Bel Air.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No verifiable source Bulwersator (talk) 10:53, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:60 Bel Air.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No verifiable source Bulwersator (talk) 10:53, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:61 Bel air.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No verifiable source Bulwersator (talk) 10:54, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:1971 Chevrolet Vega Hatchback Coupe.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No verifiable source Bulwersator (talk) 10:54, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ArtukluPalaceDoor.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• There is no evidence that author, C.Preusser was dead in 1911 Bulwersator (talk) 11:08, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I found that it is Conrad Preusser - unfortunately I was unable to find date of death Bulwersator (talk) 11:14, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Atatürk1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• User:Bulwersator tagged the file with ((db-imgcopyvio|url="This image is in the public domain in the United States. In most cases, this means that it was first published prior to January 1, 1923" but source is "clipping from Cumhuriyet" and Cumhuriyet was "founded on May 7, 1924")) but I'm not sure that his arguing is correct. According to the article Cumhuriyet, the newspaper was indeed founded in 1924. However, User:Takabeg wrote that the photo was taken in 1923. User:Takabeg later edited the page to mention the newspaper "Hakimiyet-i Milliye" (tr:Hakimiyet-i Milliye (gazete) I suppose). According to Google Translate, this newspaper was founded in 1920, which is fine. I assume that the photo was published shortly after it was taken, and if anonymous, it was also in the public domain on the URAA date. There is also a discussion on Commons on whether the change to life+70 years in Turkey was retroactive or not. Stefan2 (talk) 11:40, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Atatürk2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• User:Bulwersator added ((db-imgcopyvio)). According to Google Translate, this page tells that the photo was taken in 1922. I'm guessing that this is an important historical photo which was published shortly after it was taken and that the Cumhuriyet publication only is a reprint. If published before 1923, it is in the public domain in the United States. See also the discussion about the photo at Commons:Special:PermanentLink/77009354#米国法との関係. I don't think that it is appropriate to add a speedy tag here; the photo does at least need a proper discussion. Stefan2 (talk) 11:47, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Med BHiA mr-B.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Claimed fair use without fair use rationale, own work despite the fact that medal design is still copyrighted. Bulwersator (talk) 13:16, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:No Aliens.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Tagged ((PD-self)), but the uploader is not the creator. This image comes from [1], which describes itself as a "free animation collection", but the source page says at the bottom, "© 2000-2011 Animation Library. All rights reserved." I cannot find any explicit statement on the source page that the images have actually been released into the public domain. —Bkell (talk) 15:50, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Squirrel Barnstar.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See the preceding listing. Part of this image comes from [2], which describes itself as a "free animation collection", but the source page says at the bottom, "© 2000-2011 Animation Library. All rights reserved." I cannot find any explicit statement on the source page that the images have actually been released into the public domain. —Bkell (talk) 15:53, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:SquattersRiotMarker.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Tagged ((cc-by-3.0)), but there is no evidence that the copyright holder has agreed to release this image under this Creative Commons license. Instead, there is a nonstandard license at [3]. On a quick reading, most of it seems to be compatible with Wikipedia's requirements for free media, except for the clause, "you may not use or provide access to more than 25% of the content of any particular country, state, province, county, parish, shire, prefecture, region, department or city for commercial use without written permission from the copyright holder," which apparently places a collective restriction on how much of the content can be freely used. —Bkell (talk) 16:01, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paradigm of life pic.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Clearly too complex for ((PD-textlogo)) as tagged. January (talk) 18:48, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shelfgaps.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Tagged ((GFDL-with-disclaimers)). The blog post [4] is given as evidence of this license. But reading through the comments there, it seems to me that the blog author agreed only to license that particular post (and the images it contains) under the GFDL. This image does not come from that blog post. The author asks for opinions about licensing the whole blog under the GFDL, but there is no evidence that he or she actually agreed to this; in fact, the author expresses reluctance to do so ("I would straight out copy left my pictures but am worried that they could be used innapropriatly by right wingers to profile/monitor left wing anctivity expecially youth"). —Bkell (talk) 21:31, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:8599 waldhorn gary.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I don't believe the PD tag used for this image is correct. Cloudbound (talk) 21:53, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barrelroomgrill1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ineligible for copyright. Stefan2 (talk) 22:27, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bampur fort.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ineligible for copyright. Also, looks like an old photo so the 1991 creation date is probably wrong. Stefan2 (talk) 22:28, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:GardenOfWeld.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ineligible for copyright. Stefan2 (talk) 22:29, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Should be marked as ((PD-USGov)), if the source can be verified. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 06:50, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • TinEye has located this blog as a source; hopefully, the poster can be contacted. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 06:53, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fredrickson 2009.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ineligible for copyright. Stefan2 (talk) 22:29, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Forest Foggy.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ineligible for copyright. Stefan2 (talk) 22:29, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fahd Jassem al-freij.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ineligible for copyright. Stefan2 (talk) 22:30, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Esico.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ineligible for copyright. Stefan2 (talk) 22:30, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deem Bristow.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ineligible for copyright. Stefan2 (talk) 22:31, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crest cbba.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ineligible for copyright. Stefan2 (talk) 22:31, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • What does the Bolivian law say on the copyright status of a municipality coat of arms? (For example: in the Czech Republic, such a symbol is not protected by copyright.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 07:19, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • I don't know. In either case, there is no source. See Commons:COM:COA#Coat of arms "found on the internet". --Stefan2 (talk) 10:32, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:County Durham coa.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ineligible for copyright. Stefan2 (talk) 22:31, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Curious cat barnstar medal.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ineligible for copyright. 15th century stuff is PD-old, but this is a photo of a 3D object, so the photographer's copyright also has to be considered. Stefan2 (talk) 22:33, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Georef-global.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ineligible for copyright. Stefan2 (talk) 22:34, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gibson ES 250 guitar.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ineligible for copyright. Stefan2 (talk) 22:34, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:HospiceTag.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ineligible for copyright, but possibly ((PD-FLGov)) depending on who the creator is. Stefan2 (talk) 22:35, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:HighView of theniet el had town.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ineligible for copyright, but claimed to be own work, so maybe the uploader can be convinced to add a proper licence. Stefan2 (talk) 22:36, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:HeartInHand.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ineligible for copyright. Stefan2 (talk) 22:36, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heron.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ineligible for copyright. Stefan2 (talk) 22:37, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:HDHiggins.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ineligible for copyright. Stefan2 (talk) 22:37, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kaaba plan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ineligible for copyright. Stefan2 (talk) 22:38, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jnrlogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ineligible for copyright (photo of 3D object). Stefan2 (talk) 22:39, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Infotech enterprises.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ineligible for copyright. Stefan2 (talk) 22:40, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Keyes.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ineligible for copyright. Stefan2 (talk) 22:40, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kerney Letter3 Page3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ineligible for copyright. Stefan2 (talk) 22:40, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kerney Letter4 Page1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ineligible for copyright. Stefan2 (talk) 22:40, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kerney Letter4 Page2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ineligible for copyright. Stefan2 (talk) 22:41, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Liz White at Woman in Black.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ineligible for copyright. Stefan2 (talk) 22:42, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marco+Beltrami+beltramix.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ineligible for copyright. Stefan2 (talk) 22:42, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maspiro building.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ineligible for copyright. Stefan2 (talk) 22:42, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Radiograph showing primary hypertrophic osteoarthropathy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ineligible for copyright I'd say, but there was a discussion about this on Commons recently. Stefan2 (talk) 22:45, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Priory.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ineligible for copyright. Possibly PD-old, but needs source. Stefan2 (talk) 22:46, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prince Talal Arslan on an interview with New TV.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ineligible for copyright. Own work claimed. Stefan2 (talk) 22:46, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seal of Coventry, Rhode Island.svg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ineligible for copyright. Might be PD-something else. Stefan2 (talk) 22:48, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.