The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:De05 006.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Flagged for deletion which was reverted due to self-published claim. However, there is print down the right side of the image indicating it's scanned from a paper or magazine. Source is unknown, usage questionable, and it's unused in any article either way. Ma®©usBritish^{chat} 00:18, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Chick Bowen (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pkwiki.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• There is an uncropped version of this photo here which casts doubt on the claim of being the uploader's own work. See also Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 January 15#File:Pkshot2.JPG. VernoWhitney (talk) 01:28, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:EFIA Meet the Indian Students.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Copyright notice in EXIF data. Eeekster (talk) 08:34, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roine Eero.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The uploader has not provided any evidence that the current licence claim is valid. This photo is in the public domain in Finland if it was either published before 1966 or taken before 1963. Eero Roine died in 1966 and it is not clear when the photo was taken or whether it has been published.

The photo is only in the public domain in the United States (per ((PD-URAA))) if all of the following are true:

• The photo was first published in Finland.
• The photo was published without a copyright notice before 1 March 1989.
• The photo was either published before 1996 or taken before 1946.

Also note that both ((PD-Finland50)) and ((PD-URAA)) are partially wrong. See the corresponding templates on Commons instead. Stefan2 (talk) 13:55, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Roine made his last film in 1962. The screenshot is probably from Kipparikvartetti (1952) [1]. Widr (talk) 15:21, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

((PD-Finland50)) applies to photos. I don't know whether it also applies to screenshots from films. ((PD-Italy)) seems to apply to screenshots from films whereas ((PD-Japan-oldphoto)) doesn't seem to apply to screenshots from films. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:34, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hillevi Lagerstam.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The uploader has not provided any evidence that the current licence claim is valid. This photo is in the public domain in Finland if it was either published before 1966 or taken before 1963.

The photo is only in the public domain in the United States (per ((PD-URAA))) if all of the following are true:

• The photo was first published in Finland.
• The photo was published without a copyright notice before 1 March 1989.
• The photo was either published before 1996 or taken before 1946.

Also note that both ((PD-Finland50)) and ((PD-URAA)) are partially wrong. See the corresponding templates on Commons instead. Stefan2 (talk) 13:56, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The screenshot is definitely from a 1950s movie, possibly from Pää pystyyn, Helena (1957) [2]. Widr (talk) 15:27, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

((PD-Finland50)) applies to photos. I don't know whether it also applies to screenshots from films. ((PD-Italy)) seems to apply to screenshots from films whereas ((PD-Japan-oldphoto)) doesn't seem to apply to screenshots from films. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:34, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mirja mane.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The uploader has not provided any evidence that the current licence claim is valid. This photo is in the public domain in Finland if it was either published before 1966 or taken before 1963.

The photo is only in the public domain in the United States (per ((PD-URAA))) if all of the following are true:

• The photo was first published in Finland.
• The photo was published without a copyright notice before 1 March 1989.
• The photo was either published before 1996 or taken before 1946.

Also note that both ((PD-Finland50)) and ((PD-URAA)) are partially wrong. See the corresponding templates on Commons instead. Stefan2 (talk) 13:57, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

From Noita palaa elämään (1952) [3]. Widr (talk) 15:24, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

((PD-Finland50)) applies to photos. I don't know whether it also applies to screenshots from films. ((PD-Italy)) seems to apply to screenshots from films whereas ((PD-Japan-oldphoto)) doesn't seem to apply to screenshots from films. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:34, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This one is actually a legitimate PR shot from the movie, used in places like this. Widr (talk) 16:52, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ned Miller (Left) and Jack Benny (Right) in rehearsal for "Jack Plays Golf," which aired on November 26, 1962.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It seems to say that the uploader's grandfather appears on the photo. In that case, it is unlikely that the uploader's grandfather took the photo as claimed, so the copyright holder is probably someone else. Stefan2 (talk) 14:26, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep and convert to fair use. — ξ^xplicit 01:55, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:1953-54 Boston Bruin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Something is fishy. It seems to say that the photographer and the subject of the photo are the same person, but this seems unlikely for a photo like this. Unless the photographer, or the photographer's heir, has given permission to have the image on Wikipedia, then it can't stay here. Stefan2 (talk) 15:11, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Convert to fairuse subject is dead, no new free use photos can be created. -- 76.65.128.43 (talk) 02:50, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. The uploader did say evidence of PD would be given on request. Have you requested that the uploader provide that evidence to OTRS? Resolute 15:02, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Claims like that are not worth the bits.. The burden of proof is on the uploader, as I understood it.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:57, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Convert to fairuse Subject is deceased, so change to a fair-use rationale, if the uploader fails to provide a PD rationale. Canuck^{89 (chat with me)} 19:09, January 25, 2013 (UTC)
• I would agree with the above. Contact the uploader if you don't hear from them convert to fairuse as the subject is deceased. -DJSasso (talk) 13:16, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Waqar Azmi with Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Attributed to a different person at Commons:File:Photo with Archbishop 8.11.11.jpg. Unclear who the photographer is, if any of them. Stefan2 (talk) 18:34, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sibiricacanigula.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Claimed as PD-India but British author in copyright until 2017 Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:44, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sibiricahodgsoni.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Claimed as PD-India, But British author still in copyright until 2017 Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:45, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo for Monroe Transit.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unlikely to be free per se but does it fall within the definition of PD-textlogo? The words are probably ok but is the background original work? NtheP (talk) 22:15, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.