The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Report of Injury Peter Lawrence Ellis.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:PLE.pdf Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:50, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This document is public domain pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law, New York State Public Officers Law, Article 6--Mstadtmauer (talk) 21:56, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Luther Standing Bear and family.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• While we know authorship of this photograph, we do not know that it was published prior to 1923, as asserted in its PD rationale. According to [1], Choate's photographs were likely collected by teachers at the school where he took them and were donated to the National Anthropological Archives in 1966 and 1973. As Wikipedia:Public_domain#Unpublished_works notes, many family photos are unpublished works, and being owned by an archive doesn't make them PD. I believe we need information on publication of the photograph to retain it. This is part of a CCI, so the uploader is being notified at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20141020 in courtesy rather than directly at his talk page. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:58, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• It is usually possible to obtain a photocopy of a photograph held by an archive if you contact the archive. According to s:Letter Edged in Black Press, Inc. v. Public Building Commission of Chicago, a public artwork is published (under pre-1978 law) if the public can inspect the work and take photographs of it. Wouldn't this mean that a photograph which is publicly accessible in an archive before 1978 typically also becomes published when the archive first makes it publicly accessible? How do you determine if this publication was with or without a copyright notice?

This page suggests that the photographer died in 1902. If we can determine that it wasn't published at all before 2003, then the photograph should be fine. However, if it was first published at the archive in the 1960s or 1970s, the term becomes 95 years from publication, regardless of the year of creation. Unfortunately, the 1960s and 1970s were less than 95 years ago. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:23, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wounded Yellow Robe, Timber Yellow Robe and Henry Standing Bear.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Exact same situation as the one immediately above. Publication information unknown. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:03, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Henry Standing Bear4.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As above; same concern. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:07, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Henry Standing Bear and Korczak Ziólkowski.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• From the same CCI as the above, there's no information on authorship or publication of the image. It may not have been published at the time it was taken. There is no plausible expectation that the user in this case has conducted a search of copyright renewal, given issues explained at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 October 19. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:12, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Inferno rc.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• How do we know that the photographer agrees to GFDL? A copy on no.wiki is used in no:Radiostyrt_bil so if it is free it would be nice. But I do not think the text on the file page is clear. MGA73 (talk) 21:16, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:BorgWarner.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is a derivative work. I don't know if the trophy is published, which would affect its copyright status. Stefan2 (talk) 22:10, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Also note that there is an unrelated image with the same name on Commons. If the file is deleted, care should be taken so that the unrelated image doesn't end up in the article Borg-Warner Trophy. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:29, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.