The result of the debate was delete. --Coredesat 23:17, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This "nickname" is not mentioned in the target article, but gets a number of google hits. Unlikely search term as anyone who has heard of this name would certainly search using the real name. --- RockMFR 21:06, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Appears to only be used disparagingly in a few newspaper articles. John Reaves (talk) 04:09, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the previous comments. mattbr³⁰ 10:56, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The term was heard only sparsely and this redirect mainly acts to disparage the subject. Plus, I really wouldn't call Mr. Bush a bust just yet. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 15:42, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was delete. --Coredesat 23:17, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in the target article, no google hits. I can only assume this is some kind of (lame) joke. --- RockMFR 21:06, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I'm not sure why "Fadey" would be considered funny. John Reaves (talk) 04:10, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. mattbr³⁰ 10:47, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This isn't even that clever or funny, just disparaging. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 15:44, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was: moved to WP:RM John Reaves (talk) 04:15, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I propose deleting the redirect so that the target article can be movd to the title of the redirect. This would put the period after the initial in the article title, consistent with most other Wikipedia articles of this type. Rbraunwa 03:23, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

speedy close and move to WP:RM. I think this one can be placed on the uncontroversal section and that would take just about as long as this RFD to complete. Unless there is an objection (which I doubt will (happen here) this should take a few days to complete. --69.156.207.249 02:50, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.