The result of the debate was delete both. John Reaves (talk) 17:09, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWorld → Wikipedia:WikiProject WikiWorld[edit]

Wikiworld → Wikipedia:WikiProject WikiWorld[edit]

Cross-namespace redirect to projectspace. This was actually linked in an article (Cartoon physics) until I delinked it, so this cross-namespace redirect is more harmful than most. --ais523 17:20, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Not only unnecessary but clearly harmful. Wikiprojects should certainly not be linked to from terms that could be mainspace content. WjBscribe 17:23, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: At 07:35 Mar 16 2007, this discussion was prematurely closed and the redirect deleted out-of-process. This discussion is reopened in order to allow the discussion to run its proper course. Abstain. Rossami (talk) 15:28, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - I've added wikiworld to this nomination as it is pretty much the same thing. No opinion regarding keeping/deleting. --- RockMFR 19:20, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete also. Same reason applies. WjBscribe 01:29, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was delete. —freak(talk) 07:35, Mar. 16, 2007 (UTC)

No need for the quotes on an article about a non-copyrighted game. -- Lenoxus 00:21, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Unlikely that anyone will type this in. --- RockMFR 01:22, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was delete all. John Reaves (talk) 17:11, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Bai (disambigous) → Bai (disambiguation)

A properly named DAB page exists. No edit history before redirect created. JohnI 09:25, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Cyborg (disambigation) → Cyborg (disambiguation)

A properly named DAB page exists. No edit history before redirect created. JohnI 09:25, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Miami (disambigation) → Miami (disambiguation)

A properly named DAB page exists. Some edit history will be lost if deleted. JohnI 09:25, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Spooks, disambig → Spook

A properly named DAB page exists. Edit history looks like "sandbox" (someone testing). JohnI 09:25, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• The black prince (disambigation) → The Black Prince

A properly named DAB page exists. Some edit history will be lost if deleted. JohnI 09:25, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Vathi (disambigation) → Vathy (disambiguation)

A properly named DAB page exists. No edit history before redirect created. JohnI 09:25, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: recommending deletion as DAB is:
  incorrectly spelt (missing u),
  or incorrect format (comma & no brackets)
  or non-standard spelling (disambigOUS) JohnI 09:33, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all - misspelled, not likely to be searched for, and not linked. Gavia immer (talk) 14:58, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• History-merge all with history and delete all the misspellings are useless, but the history may as well be kept. --ais523 16:45, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete all. YechielMan 20:30, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all as typos --Maelwys 18:42, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all. A history merge is needed for Miami (disambigation). None of the others require any work, as far as I can see. --- RockMFR 19:11, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was converted to disambig. -- JLaTondre 01:27, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Ingress" does not appear to be a brand or version of Ingres, just a misspelling; RFD or replace with stub or article for the actual word, cf Egress. Ruyn 15:21, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep. It seems a plausible misspelling to me. Regardless, do not return the article to any version that was about the word. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Rossami (talk) 15:24, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Convert to disambig. Ingress filtering, Ingress Bell, wikt:ingress, etc... --- RockMFR 19:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was keep

These are two different German newspapapers, so the redirect is misleading. Well, the former is a spinoff of the latter (split in 1998 or so). Still, the only thing that unites them today is passionate mutual enmity. Johannes Rohr 16:36, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Pavel Vozenilek 01:36, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep until a separate article is written, at which point the new article can replace the redirect. There is no reason to delete the redirect from history. In the meantime, the nomination makes it clear that there is a historical link between the concepts and the Jungle World is discussed in the target article. Readers will be best served by a stub if/when we have enough independent content but in the meantime are better served by a redirect than by a redlink. Rossami (talk) 15:19, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep until it can be turned into it's own article, as per Rossami's reasoning. --Maelwys 18:46, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.