The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 15:34, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how these two terms are related, an episode of Full House and Bitch. meshach (talk) 07:20, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as probable vandalism by a contributor with a troubled edit history. Rossami (talk) 21:03, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was Disambiguate. -- JLaTondre 14:14, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The German and the Austrian secret service have "Nachrichtendienst" in their name as well. To redirect the entry "Nachrichtendienst" to just the Swiss secret service would narrow it too much Don Marco (talk) 10:00, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate (or delete it). Apparently a large number of government agencies in Europe have included this German-language term in their names. Moreover, it seems that more than one of them has been referred to in English as "Nachrichtendienst". This term either needs to be disambiguated, or else it should be a red link. It should not be a redirect. — Gavia immer (talk) 16:00, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 14:06, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was moving this page to an article name without quotes but accidentally hit enter after removing the last quote, so I managed to make a double redirect TexMurphy (talk) 10:23, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as happened to all other similar cases. Quotes are useless, confusing and implausible. -- Magioladitis (talk) 01:06, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Double "redirect" corrected, without prejudice to the nomination. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 16:44, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as correction of misplaced article. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 16:44, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Yet another redirect with unnecessary quotes. -- Nips (talk) 22:49, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was speedy delete of double move by nominator. Whether it's G6 or G7 is unclear. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 16:44, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See previous nomination, I was moving the original article but hit enter too early thereby creating a bad redirect TexMurphy (talk) 10:23, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete. Why you nominated this? This is a typo created by accident and can be speedy deleted. -- Magioladitis (talk) 01:05, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.