November 30

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 30, 2008

Bood valuesWikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Blood values

The result of the debate was Retarget to Reference ranges for blood tests. Lenticel (talk) 05:27, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Highly unlikely CNR to a project page. MBisanz talk 09:58, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was just a stupid spelling error, remaining after a compensating article move. Jolly well delete it. Mikael Häggström (talk) 16:30, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Still, though, it sounds kind of funny. Yet, I don't think that reason is good enough to keep it. Mikael Häggström (talk) 16:31, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Wikipedia status → Wikipedia:Editor activity indicator

The result of the debate was Delete. Ruslik (talk) 15:07, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Improper CNR to a wiki-process, does not link to content. MBisanz talk 09:57, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Wikipedia Cookbook → Wikipedia:Cookbook

The result of the debate was Delete. Ruslik (talk) 07:14, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Improper CNR to a defunct project, does not link to content. MBisanz talk 09:56, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

BIDRAFT1 → Wikipedia:BITERM guideline proposal draft 1 (sandbox working version)

The result of the debate was Delete. Ruslik (talk) 14:59, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Improper CNR to a project draft, does not link to content. MBisanz talk 09:55, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK - it only a redirect page. I'll comment there. --Matt Lewis (talk) 15:03, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If this use of redirect is against policy, what do you suggest? I'll do what is suggested. The WP:BITASK taskforce itself is important, and is only on hold pending discussion at WP:IDTF. --Matt Lewis (talk) 15:06, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well the redirect WP:BIDRAFT1 would probably be the best redirect, since it puts the page in the Projectspace so readers would not see it on a search for articles. MBisanz talk 20:34, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I see what you mean now. I'll get on it tomorrow. Sometimes people are funny when you use "WP:" - so sometimes I've kept away from it. With the search box in mind though, using WP makes a lot more sense - this page is for wikipedians, not the encyclopedia readers. --Matt Lewis (talk) 00:13, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK - I've created WP:BIDRAFT1 and WP:BIDRAFT2, and have sorted the 'What links here' pages that link to them. You can delete BIDRAFT1 and BIDRAFT2. --Matt Lewis (talk) 07:24, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Zelda 14The Legend of Zelda: Phantom Hourglass

The result of the debate was Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Unscented (talk) 22:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is no fourteeth Zelda game; most of the the numbered redirects to Zelda games went to the wrong pages, and when I fixed them, this one was left over. Unscented (talk) 19:01, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.