December 28
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 28, 2011
Wikipedia:CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was Keep. Ruslik_Zero 14:48, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Highly implausible CTJF83 22:27, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ceep (do you see what I did there?) It is a humorous redirect to a humorous page, the number of "C" 's (30... I had to borrow an Arb to finalise the count. ps. this is a lie) in the redirect being the number of words starting with C in the essay - it is not intended to be found in the normal manner in which redirects are used, just a little joke for anyone who digs a little into the page, and is obviously a delete under strict interpretation of the rules... but that was never the intent. I should also note that the other page redirect WP:CXXX serves the same point, and likely fails the policy page and may usefully be included in the discussion. However, I claim WP:IAR is the policy that should be the one governing in this matter. LessHeard vanU (talk) 23:37, 28 December 2011 (UTC) ps. I would like to thank all here for following the link(s), and indeed the nomination - it is possible that my silly little page will double its readership.[reply]
- Keep Harmless jokes are useful for the community, and this is a lot more worthy than many other sillinesses. Johnuniq (talk) 00:36, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep but move to Wikipedia:CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC. This removes two C's from the name, which reduces the load on the servers. Herostratus (talk) 04:55, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Achilles (1903 Automobile)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was Keep. 'Unnecessary' is not a particularly strong reason to delete a redirect as redirects are cheap. Ruslik_Zero 14:51, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Redirect is an unnecessary as the main article is reasonably titled and easily found via search or disambiguation. Warren (talk) 22:14, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: relatively high hit count suggest that this harmless redirect is used by some external resource. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 09:22, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Only a couple of hits a week according to the stats so hardly high! Warren (talk) 20:08, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
User:EShakti
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was Speedy Delete, R2 by User:Orangemike. Lenticel (talk) 13:12, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Redirect from user space to article space may be confusing. User account "EShakti" is not registered. – Wdchk (talk) 19:16, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as U2. Non-existent user. Looks like it was added by an inexperienced user. Thorncrag 19:38, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete: common use case of WP:SPEEDY. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 20:29, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Perferred sex
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to Preferred sex. Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 07:19, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
'Speedy deletion criterion G1'.
This does not appear to be jargon or a misspelling of something that could make sense. Qwerty (talk) 06:06, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I think R3 is the better choice.--70.24.207.225 (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: This doesn't qualify for speedy deletion as it has more then 5 years. Still the wording doesn't make sense and the hit count is lower then one would generally expect from a long-living redirect. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 09:17, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but redirect to Preferred sex. Nonsense as implemented, this does make sense as a typographical redirect, i.e., Perferred sex->Preferred sex->Sexual preference->Sexual orientation. byronshock (talk) 12:44, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It would actually make more sense to redirect to Sexual orientation since the new proposed redirects already redirects there.--70.24.207.225 (talk) 19:19, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.