The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. There's no apparent connection between this phrase and the target. --BDD (talk) 21:41, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Micro Academy → Culture Brain (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

This redirect is disputed by an IP editor:

• ""Micro Academy" does NOT exist and should be deleted." (edit summary)
• "it is a mistake because of this: http://www.gamefaqs.com/features/company/74053.html ... I already corrected/removed in on GameFAQs. In fact that game was published by Culture Brain. "Micro Academy" probably exists but it has nothing to do with video games (Culture Brain) in this case. I think the page should be deleted in order to avoid confusion. This redirect makes 100% no sense, trust me. Plus, the article Culture Brain doesn't even mention "Micro Academy". If you think the page should stay, be my guest then... it just makes Wikipedia looks "stup*d"." (on my talk page)

I am nominating it for discussion here as a courtesy, since I know nothing about this topic area. — This, that and the other (talk) 12:16, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:41, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Melbourns Rebels squad → Template:Melbourne Rebels squad (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Delete – This redirect seems to have been created by accident during a page move. It was used for a while, but only because no one saw fit to correct the typo. Nevertheless, the redirect had only had one edit before I added the deletion template, and the templated redirect itself was only used on five pages. It doesn't seem useful, it's not a common search term and it's not really a plausible typo, it should be deleted. – PeeJay 11:10, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. There doesn't seem to be much to go by here. Interested parties are fully authorized to be bold. --BDD (talk) 22:43, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Land Reform Ordinance → Land reform in Kerala (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

I suggested that the page might better be a disambiguation page, even though I didn't have any other entries in-hand. JohnBlackburne suggested that Land Reform Ordinance might better point to Land reforms by country; it being a far better target as it lists many countries and describes them, with links where appropriate. JohnBlackburne indicated that it might take a bit of work to merge, but wasn't sure if it's needed as India is described in a broad way. Widefox agreed and suggested that the issue be posted here at "Redirects for discussion". There has been no dispute, just brain-storming. --Bejnar (talk) 04:54, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, though not as-is. The pagehistory shows that content existed at this title from 2003 thru 2011. That creates a high likelihood that inbound links remain both in the project's internal history and externally. Link rot is an evil that we should avoid whenever possible. That said, I have no objection to an overwrite either with disambiguation content or a better redirect. You can be bold and do either of those.
  That said, I have so far been unable to find any other laws passed with the exact name - "Land Reform Ordinance". You could plausible redirect it as a capitalization variant to land reform ordinances which might be the better place for disambiguation of other land reform laws such as the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003, or Zimbabwe's 1992 Land Acquisition Act. Or perhaps this title really refers to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. No, looking at the page history, they're probably not the same. So count that as another plausible disambig listing. Rossami (talk) 23:21, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedily deleted by Legoktm per G5 (Creation by a blocked or banned user in violation of block or ban). (Non-admin closure.) Sideways713 (talk) 13:05, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Peopledom of Taiwan → Taiwan (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Hoax / Original research HNAKXR (talk) 02:47, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedily deleted by Legoktm per G5 (Creation by a blocked or banned user in violation of block or ban). (Non-admin closure.) Sideways713 (talk) 13:03, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Peopledom of China → Taiwan (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Hoax / Original research HNAKXR (talk) 02:47, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.