The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:57, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Corea del Norte → North Korea (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Not especially Spanish. TheChampionMan1234 07:47, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:R#DELETE #8 and WP:FORRED. quant18 (talk) 11:52, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:NOT a translation dictionary. North Korea did not exist until the 50's, and Spain's influence and empire building era ended long before that. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:35, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per quant18 --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:49, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:FORRED. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 15:52, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:58, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Corea d'o Nord → North Korea (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Not especially Portuguese. TheChampionMan1234 07:47, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:R#DELETE #8 and WP:FORRED. quant18 (talk) 11:52, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:NOT a translation dictionary. North Korea did not exist until the 50's, and Portugal's influence and empire building era ended centuries before that. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 04:48, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:FORRED. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 15:53, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:01, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• The Great King Shivaji Bhosale → Shivaji (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Per WP:RFD#DELETE Reason 3, also this title is not widely used at all and is not an established term per last para of WP:RNEUTRAL. The target page already has numerous combinations of redirects, but this one pushes it too far. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 07:38, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:R#DELETE criterion 8: one of multiple combinations of name fragments, not particularily established as whole. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 15:57, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:59, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Afeganistão → Afghanistan (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Not especially Portuguese. TheChampionMan1234 05:35, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:R#DELETE #8 and WP:FORRED. quant18 (talk) 11:52, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:NOT a translation dictionary. This zone was never under Portuguese control -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:37, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per quant18 .--Lenticel ^(talk) 01:02, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:FORRED. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 15:58, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete and keep, respectively. --BDD (talk) 20:27, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Languages of North Korea → North–South differences in the Korean language (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 
• North Korean language → North–South differences in the Korean language (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Korean is obviously not the only language spoken in North Korea, as there is a significant Chinese minority, And also see Demographics_of_North_Korea, there are other minorities ethnicity, thus there are other minority languages. TheChampionMan1234 00:01, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep North Korean language , the target article explains the differences between North Korea's Korean (ie. North Korean) and the South's. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:35, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Languages of North Korea , there's more than one language in North Korea in use, possibly retarget to Demographics of North Korea, though it lacks coverage. WP:REDLINK. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:35, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• No , I would delete both as we have redirects like Swiss language and Australian language, thus we should delete the second one until Languages of North Korea is created. TheChampionMan1234 10:48, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep North Korean language per 65.94.171.126. North Korea is not remotely an officially multilingual country like Switzerland, or even a multicultural immigrant one like Australia. Chinese traders, Japanese spouses, and Egyptian expats working for Orascom amount to maybe 0.1% or 0.2% of the population; their presence would hardly make anyone seriously call Chinese, Japanese, or Arabic as "languages of North Korea". quant18 (talk) 11:52, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep both: apparently Korean language dominates throughout the country, and I can't find any mention of other languages even as recognised minority languages. FWIW presence of minority ethnic groups does not necessarily mean that these groups retain language and culture. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 17:06, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.