< April 30
May 2 >

May 1

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 1, 2016.

Alkali lake

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retargetto Alkali Lake. JohnCD (talk) 08:57, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is another page [1], which also has soda lake listed. End RD and point to name searched for. Smarkflea (talk) 22:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rete tranviaria di Lugano

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Deryck C. 15:38, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There aren't any other redirect pages like this one. Indeed, very few pages even show up when the term "Rete tranviaria" is searched for (see here). <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 22:48, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There are certainly some a bit like this, such as Tramway du Havre (-> Le Havre tramway), but that is (or should be if it ain't it will be) an ((R from original language)) (in this case fr) generally about a specific network and company, which I think is somewhat different from a general article on trams in some place. However, this in the lede has the Italian right in the lede, and says that the company/operator has gone through several name changes, so I see no harm in keeping this. I'll mark it as ((R from original language|it)) if not already done. Si Trew (talk) 12:55, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I have been the main contributor or translator on a few French-language tramway/tram articles such as Old Rouen Tramway and Casablanca Tramway so this just seems fine to me by the standards of other articles on trams/tramways. (Although I didn't bother to create Tramway de Casablanca as it seemed near enough the search engine would find it.) So I don't exactly have a vested interest but it is normal if translating or referencing a native-language term to use ((R from original language)) or ((R from other language)), that's what they're for. (Incidentally we don't have ((R from native language)) which I am tempted to create as an R to ((R from original language)) but not sure the language parameter would get passed along properly, it didn't in the days before Lua.) Si Trew (talk) 12:57, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mid-terms

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Term (time), but there's also consensus to disambiguate, which can be done BOLDly. --BDD (talk) 20:47, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Too vague. Other possible targets include Midterm exam and Term (time). ~ RobTalk 06:11, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguate per my comments below. -- Tavix (talk) 20:54, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The other feasible solution would be a disambiguation at Midterm or Midterms. I could support that. -- Tavix (talk) 16:50, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I would also support disambiguation. ~ RobTalk 19:48, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I would support that. I was surprised at Midterm redirecting to Term (time) and had expected it to go to the election page. Peter James (talk) 22:08, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 20:44, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Caspian Tredwell-Owen

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 09:03, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:XY. Caspian Tredwell-Owen wrote both The Island (2005 film) and Beyond Borders (film), so it makes no sense to redirect to only one of his films when he's written multiple films. He's also mentioned in several other articles, so search results would give our readers a wider understanding of what Tredwell-Owen has done, instead of pigeon-holing our readers towards only one of his works. -- Tavix (talk) 17:08, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's fair to make the conclusion that the AFD found he was more notable for The Island. SwisterTwister picked The Island as a redirect target even though he said that he was known for both, and it seems the other participant just went along with it. no alternate title suggests itself is patently false because Beyond Borders (film) is an alternate target. Finally, deleting is better than the status quo, per WP:R#D1: the redirect makes it unreasonably difficult to find the other places he's mentioned on Wikipedia. Deleting the redirect would send our readers to search results where they can see all of his credits and decide which article they want to go to. -- Tavix (talk) 22:55, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Categorry:Suburbs of Waratah-Wynyard Council, Tasmania

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 19:59, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects of namespace mispellings not useful Naraht (talk) 13:53, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

3.141592653589793238462643383279502​88419716939937510582097494459230781640628620​89986280348253421170679821480865132823066470938446095​505822317253594081284811174502841027019​8521105559644622948954930381964

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Deleted by Sphilbrick (non-admin closure) --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 13:40, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another unfeasible redirect to pi.  ONR  (talk)  11:13, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, fixed this with a couple of word breaks. Uanfala (talk) 13:15, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per R3: Implausible typo, uncommon search term, and no articles that use this level of precision as a title. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:14, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Draft:Untitled tenth Metallica studio album

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was deleted per WP:G7 (author requests deletion). Deryck C. 20:50, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moved into the mainspace; could someone please remove the draft redirect? Thanks. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 11:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2021 NBA draft

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all. JohnCD (talk) 20:00, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. No specific information about these future drafts are at the target article. -- Tavix (talk) 02:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Have you seen the non-redirect versions? All it said was that an NBA draft will occur in June 20xx, which doesn't say much of anything. A guy saved by Jesus quickly redirected it to the draft, which, admittedly, helps even less. At least if we redlink it, our readers will know we don't have any real information on the draft until the appropriate time comes. -- Tavix (talk) 23:00, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
More