< November 12
November 14 >

November 13

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 13, 2016.

Slovenia (general), Slovenia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Deleted by User:Tone. (non-admin closure) Si Trew (talk) 09:42, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This makes no sense. -- Tavix (talk) 22:42, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Non-Muslim

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 November 23#Non-Muslim

California air pollution control/emission regulation redirects

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was there's clear consensus to delete these, as even those who want them retained in some way were split as to what to do with them. I'll grant one concession, retargeting California emission standards to United States emission standards#California as that particular redirect matches the target exactly. -- Tavix (talk) 15:36, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

These redirects could be seen as misleading since the subject of the target article is a government agency, instead of a subject regarding air pollution controls, regulations or standards in California as a whole. Steel1943 (talk) 20:53, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 17:54, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Alternative Fuels Plan

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 15:51, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Term not mentioned in target article. Steel1943 (talk) 20:48, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 17:52, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bhután

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep Bhután; delete Kingdom of Bhután. -- Tavix (talk) 15:45, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mixed language redirect. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 00:04, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 17:50, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, and not even in particularly old ones. Just the other month I had to sing that something was blesséd, where the diacritical marks in things such as Hymns Ancient and Modern are used as stress marks, which I imagine is what would have happened here... as well as all kinds of errors such as optical character recognition not being perfect and whatnot. Unless there is any firm evidence that this form is useful to an English-speaking audience I do not see that it is helpful to know that it is how it is written in Hungarian: that's easy to find out by clicking on the Interwiki link for Bhutan, which indeed was exactly what I did (Hungarian doesn't have a Bh- on native words any more than English does, but often preserves spellings of foreign words, as it seems mostly to have done in this instance but added the written distinction there is in Hungarian sounds between "a" and "á". I imagine this actually comes via English into Hungarian, otherwise it would be simply "hu:Butan". Unfortunately even the best Hungarian dictionaries – and I have them – haven't etymologies, so that's just an educated guess: since sounds or digraphs like sh and th and wh and ch aren't formed that way in the Hungarian alphabet, it's pretty obviously a loanword in Hungarian.) Usually this goes as "no affinity to Hungarian" (or whatever), and I can confirm first-hand that it hasn't. Si Trew (talk) 19:39, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Multi-Tool Notepad

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 15:24, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Obscure synonym, unsure as to what this refers to, a quick google reveals many obscure topics unrelated to one another. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 00:01, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can that information be added to the article? That would ensure a keep. Even if Multi-Tool was never realized, if there's evidence that suggests it was a predecessor to the 1985 one, it could be used as background information. But if they're unrelated products, then nevermind. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:03, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've updated the May 1983 item in Timeline of DOS operating systems, and agree that this product introduction should be mentioned in the Microsoft Notepad article. I'm taking a break, and may get to that in a couple days or so... wbm1058 (talk) 16:06, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Check out the paragraph I added to the lead of Microsoft Notepad. wbm1058 (talk) 10:41, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 17:51, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

John Abraham (MP)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedily deleted by Sarahj2107. --BDD (talk) 15:30, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as confusing. The move message (“His actual name. D'OH.”) implies that “John” is a mistake, not an alternative name. Gorobay (talk) 17:42, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Close...as I did, G6/G7. Deleted. Muffled Pocketed 09:57, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The importance of arabic language in the study of islam

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 11:53, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here's another essay article that was redirected instead of deleted. While I'm sure the Arabic Language is important when studying Islam, this doesn't seem like a plausible or helpful search term. -- Tavix (talk) 17:40, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mini-job

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget. -- Tavix (talk) 15:22, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget all four to Mini job, for now. This may not be as obvious as it seems, because (as IP editor) I've tagged Mini job today as a ((merge to)) the current target, marginal employment, but until we have (probably silent) consensus to do that merge, these should be retargeted as ((R from other punctuation)). I've tagged all for now as ((R from other name)) (not yet any as ((R from plural))). Si Trew (talk) 16:14, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

WOOOOOOOOOO

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Deleted by User:RHaworth after listing as WP:G6 and WP:SNOW by (non-admin closure) Si Trew (talk) 10:28, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Completing nomination on behalf of Carrot official, who added the discussion banner to the redirect but was confused as to how to add the listing here, and has not as yet given a reason for discussion. Also pinging Tompw who was involved in a brief discussion on Carrot official's talk page. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:44, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, actually, they did give a reason: "This seems like an implausible redirect to me. Carrot official (talk) 00:23, 13 November 2016 (UTC)" Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:48, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Time craft

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 15:20, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not finding evidence that this term is synonymous with its target, or a term at all for that matter. Most results I get when searching the redirect in external search engines are for names of unnotable businesses. Steel1943 (talk) 20:22, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Godsy (TALKCONT) 10:36, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
More