The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 15:07, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Everythingism → Trivialism  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in the target, nor in any other article. Google results suggest there are a variety of meanings, none of which seem to have very much to do with trivialism. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 23:04, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Support Not related to trivialism, or anything else in Wikipedia. Paradoctor (talk) 05:06, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:38, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• The structure of the senate → Parliament of Australia  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Australia isn't the only country with a senate. ((3x|p))ery (talk) 22:21, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. We don't even have a complete list of senates to redirect it to (just lists of current and former national upper houses with this name at Senate). Thryduulf (talk) 23:58, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as many countries have senates. Joseph2302 (talk) 06:25, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak retarget to Senate, since the article does mention different ways senates can be structured. cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 21:30, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as ambiguous. Raymond1922 (talk) 02:26, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. If somebody thinks a better target exists (or if nominator now feels strongly about the proposed retarget / dab) they may create a new redirect or dab at this title. Deryck C. 15:06, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Unified Communications Server → IceWarp Mail Server  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete or retarget to Unified communications. Notice incorrect capitalization. Stumbled upon while attempting to fix ((Infobox software)) in article CommuniGate Pro. 84.250.17.211 (talk) 17:21, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Could also disambiguate because of possibilities, but I don't like making a list and have no idea what one would include... plus the capitalization. 84.250.17.211 (talk) 17:23, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 00:19, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:BBRD → Wikipedia:Bold, revert, discuss  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I don't understand why this redirect is necessary when WP:BRD exists as a redirect to Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. It is a meaningless redirect. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:16, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget I meant to target it to Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. I occasionally type WP:BBRD rather than WP:BRD because I think of it as "be bold, revert, discuss". I don't think it's meaningless at all, just accidentally targeted it to the wrong page... cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 19:19, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per Cymru.lass - not meaningless at all and there is no limit to the number of shortcuts that any one page can have. It's not ambiguous with anything else, so there is no problem to resolve there (not that deletion would actually be the correct way to solve it if it were). Thryduulf (talk) 00:25, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Reasonable shortcut: Be Bold, Revert, Discuss. Fix the double redirect and all is well. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 05:29, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget. Although if this hadn't been nominated for RFD, bot would have automatically fixed the double redirect by now. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:12, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch#Synonyms for said. Request unopposed. Deryck C. 15:04, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• WP:EXPLAIN → Wikipedia:Explanationism  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Proposing retarget to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch#Synonyms for said. The "explanationism" essay seems relatively obscure and this redirect for it is seldom used, and the guidance in the Wikipedia Manual of Style about being careful about using the word "explain" is important. I discovered this redirect when I wrote "WP:EXPLAIN" in an edit summary to provide the rationale for why I was replacing the word "explain" with "said", and then discovered that the link did not lead to where I thought it did. The redirect currently gets about one view every 4 days. From the time of creation of this redirect in 2006 until 2009, it led to a different place – what seems to now be WP:TALK#USE. The change of the redirect destination in 2009 to its current target coincided with the creation of the essay by the same user. That user exhibited problematic editing behavior and was blocked a dozen times starting in 2005, and was indef-blocked in 2015 following an ANI consensus. I'm not particularly fond of the essay, which is only 7 sentences long and in my opinion doesn't provide a lot of value. Someone else retargeted the redirect to a different place in September 2012 (Wikipedia:Editing policy#Be helpful: explain), but self-reverted the change a month later (and retired not long after that). I have added a hatnote to the destination essay to inform readers of the other three alternative interpretations. —BarrelProof (talk) 18:33, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 15:05, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Clicking Bad → Cookie Clicker  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I like the game, but it's not mentioned at the target or anywhere else.

( In case you're into meth empires: http://clickingbad.nullism.com/ ;) ) Paradoctor (talk) 16:56, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as failing WP:RPURPOSE. Looks like a different game altogether. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 08:42, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The game is one of the many descendants inspired by Cookie Clicker, which is alluded to in one of the upgrade options in the game, which allows you to "open a portal to another universe full of Cookies, err... Crystal Meth". Paradoctor (talk) 13:12, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. "Clicking Bad" was mentioned in the target article at the time it was redirected there, but the mention has understandably been removed at some point in the intervening four and a half years, and the game is now mentioned nowhere in the encyclopaedia, so there is no useful target for this redirect. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 22:35, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was withdrawn. Thryduulf (talk) 17:33, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• NFL GameDay → NFL Network  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This redirects to NFL Network. But NFL GameDay (NFL Network show) also exists, and it would seem that that article should be at this title. Further, Sunday NFL Countdown used to be titled NFL GameDay... So maybe this should be converted to a WP:DABPAGE?... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:18, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• On second thought, even with the Sunday NFL Countdown situation, this is at worst a WP:TWODABS situation – so it seems to me that NFL GameDay (NFL Network show) needs to be moved to NFL GameDay. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:46, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • @IJBall: If you are proposing a page move then you want WP:RM not WP:RFD. Thryduulf (talk) 17:00, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • I wasn't sure, at first. But, yeah – this can be withdrawn, and I'll hit WP:RM on this. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:01, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:39, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• J'aime aller a la peche → Fishing  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This term isn't used in the target article, so someone would not be able to learn of the significance of this phrase (if there is any?) at the target. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:16, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This translates from French as "I like to go fishing" so the link to the target is clear in that sense, but it doesn't seem to have any significance as a phrase - it doesn't appear to be a media title, catchphrase, meme or anything like that. There is nothing at fr:J'aime aller a la peche or anything similar. The only place on Wikimedia it seems to be used is in a Wikibooks book about Louisiana French (b:Louisiana French/Time) where it is part of an example phrase - "Le lundi, j'aime aller à la pêche." ("On Mondays, I like to go fishing."). All in all not a useful search term for anything on the English Wikipedia (or probably even the French Wikipedia). Thryduulf (talk) 14:38, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as nonsensical. -- The Anome (talk) 15:11, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:CHEAP. 100% of all people searching this would be looking for fishing. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:21, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Actually, if anybody did search for this they would almost certainly be looking for fr:Pêche (halieutique). Per WP:FORRED redirects like this mislead that we have French language content here and make it harder for people to find French language content elsewhere. Finally, per my comment above, I'm not seeing any evidence that anybody is likely to be looking for this. Thryduulf (talk) 17:32, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This looks like an excellent title for a Cajun or zydeco song – however, no such song seems to exist, to my sorrow. A Google search turned up nothing relevant at all. A worthless redirect. Narky Blert (talk) 07:51, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Narky Blert: You could always write that song... Thryduulf (talk) 17:52, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Thryduulf: Hélas, je suis pas Joe Falcon ou Cléoma Breaux... :( Narky Blert (talk) 18:21, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unnecessary redirect with no obvious rationale. not impressed with the keep vote above. --DBigXrayᗙ 09:10, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Wrong venue. To make a new redirect, you follow the instructions at Help:Redirect or you can request a new redirect at WP:AFC/R. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 08:34, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Indian Bull Terrier → Gull Terr  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Indian Bull Terrier should redirected into Gull Terr as its about the same dog breed . Dwanyewest (talk) 14:06, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @Dwanyewest: Are you asking for permission to create this redirect? There hasn't been anything at this title since an article was speedy deleted (for no content, it was literally just an empty page categorised in Category:Dog breeds orginating in the Indian Subcontinent) in December 2007. You don't need permission to create such a redirect, just do it. If you can't for technical reasons, you should make a request at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects (WP:AFC/R). Thryduulf (talk) 14:48, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Thryduulf: I am asking permission for Indian Bull Terrier to be redirected to Gull Terr and because I don't know how to do redirects so if someone wants to do it on my behalf I would be most grateful. Dwanyewest (talk) 15:18, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Dwanyewest: Help:Redirect will teach you all you need to know. Thryduulf (talk) 17:01, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 22:49, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Kunjali Marakkar (2018 film) → Santosh Sivan  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Kunjali Marakkar (2019 film) → Santosh Sivan  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Kunjali Marakkar (2020 film) → Santosh Sivan  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

There is no mention of a film by this name at the target, nor can I find any content about a film of this name post-dating Kunjali Marakkar (1967 film). If this and Kunjali Marakkar (2017 film) (nominated below) are deleted the the 1967 film should be moved over the Kunjali Marakkar (film) redirect. Thryduulf (talk) 11:11, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adding the (2019 film) and (2020 film) redirects to this nomination. In addition to the above rationale, WP:CRYSTAL probably applies to these. Thryduulf (talk) 11:15, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: All the four redirects including the one I nominated below was created on the same day, which means the creator itself is uncertain about the film's release year. As of now, there's no such film in production.--Let There Be Sunshine 14:22, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. This may be Kunjali Marikkar IV, which seems to have been in development for ever. Get back to us if there's ever any sign of progress.

Also, support move Kunjali Marakkar (1967 film) -> Kunjali Marakkar (film), for obvious reasons. Narky Blert (talk) 07:42, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Narky Blert the move Kunjali Marakkar (1967 film) -> Kunjali Marakkar (film) is completed, as uncontroversial move over redirect.--DBigXrayᗙ 08:48, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and support move, as per above comment. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:10, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete since the movie does not exist at the target.--DBigXrayᗙ 08:48, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 22:49, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Kunjali Marakkar (2017 film) → Santosh Sivan  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

2017 is over and no such film has been made. --Let There Be Sunshine 09:05, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nominator, there is no mention of any film by this name at the target article and no mention on Wikipedia of a film of this name post-dating Kunjali Marakkar (1967 film) that I can find. Thryduulf (talk) 11:08, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. See my comments at Kunjali Marakkar (2018 film), above. Narky Blert (talk) 07:42, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per the others. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:11, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as it does not exist. Neither in the real life nor on the target page. --DBigXrayᗙ 08:35, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Withdrawn; Another Believer is going to address the inconsistency in a different way. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:38, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Dilly Dilly → Lavender's Blue  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Dilly, Dilly → Anheuser-Busch brands  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

I don't think there's a good argument for either page being the target; the disambiguation page at Dilly is better. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:23, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For those who have avoided the latest Budweiser ad campaign: [1] is a ref about it. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:26, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.businessinsider.com/bud-light-dilly-dilly-viral-commercial-super-bowl-campaign-2017-12

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/27/morgan-stanley-says-beer-sales-are-rising-helped-by-dilly-dilly-ads.html

https://www.inc.com/jeff-haden/dilly-dilly-a-marketing-expert-analyzes-highly-successful-bud-light-ad-campaign.html

There might actually be enough info for an article about the marketing campaign... I don't know if it's appropriate to create a stub while this discussion is ongoing, but I'd be willing to write a stub if editors would prefer that over a redirect page. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 00:32, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to create an article about the campaign, I'm happy to speedy-close this (I assume it's permitted as nobody has !voted contrary). A hatnote can point to the poem if necessary. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:36, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Power~enwiki: Yes, I'd be willing to create a stub. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 00:37, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• I assume some people will always associate "Dilly Dilly" (or "Dilly, Dilly") with the beer commercials (which is why I redirected both pages to Anheuser-Busch brands, originally). Another option is to redirect to Dilly. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 00:25, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Are there any other things Dilly Dilly can refer to besides the ancient rhyme and the Bud commercials? If there's only two, redirect to one and hat there to the other pbp 00:29, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.